Between the lines of State Dept denial

Published
13

WASHINGTON: The US State Department said on Thursday that Prime Minister Imran Khan’s claims of a US involvement in the no-trust move against his government were just allegations without any truth.

In what appeared to be a slip of tongue, the prime minister during his address to the nation, named the United States as the country that was allegedly behind the letter, but then quickly corrected himself, saying that it was another country and not America.

When Dawn contacted the State Department for comment on the prime minister’s statement, one of their spokespersons: said “There is no truth to these allegations.”

This is an unusually blunt comment on a statement by a head of government, but is indicative of the growing frustration in Washington with the allegations coming out of Islamabad recently.

The department, however, did not respond to the question of what impact such allegations could have on US-Pakistan relations and their contacts with Pakistan’s diplomatic missions in the US.

Diplomatic observers in Washington say that this could have a negative impact on bilateral relations and could make US officials more careful in interacting with Pakistani officials.

They explained that embassies and officials of the host nations often use informal meetings to convey “thoughts and feelings” that cannot be sent through proper diplomatic channels.

“Embassies are like listening posts. They hear many things and share those with their government for them to read and analyse,” said one such observer. “But if you make officials of the host nation feel embarrassed, they will not talk to you and your embassy will no longer be a listening post.”

Michael Kugelman, a scholar of South Asian affairs at the Wilson Center, Washington, noted that “over the history of US-Pakistan relations, it’s been quite common for officials on both sides, in private conversations, to vent and share personal and negative assessments on current developments.”

But it’s “a stretch to liken this to a threat, much less an indication of regime change,” he added.

Pakistani journalist Nasim Zehra, while responding to Mr Kugelman’s comments on the social media, said that a US undersecretary of state did call the outgoing Pakistani ambassador Asad Majeed Khan to “deliver a demarche” for Islamabad and told him that “as long as Mr. Khan is the PM, relations with Pakistan cannot improve and if he goes Pakistan can be forgiven for its mistakes.”

She described this as an “outrageous official communication” that “all must condemn.”

Mr Kugelman said that someone other than an undersecretary would have made this comment, perhaps an assistant secretary, who’d be more likely to speak to the ambassador. Perhaps part of a farewell call to the ambassador before his departure for his new posting.”

Published in Dawn, April 1st, 2022

Opinion

Editorial

No talks
Updated 17 Oct, 2026

No talks

The government should understand that the PTI’s protest march and its reaction to it will look like nothing more than a storm in a teacup.
Strengthening LGs
17 Oct, 2026

Strengthening LGs

THE ECP has done well to refuse to allow the Punjab administration to push the local government elections to April....
Lesser citizens
17 Oct, 2026

Lesser citizens

FOR decades, discrimination and prejudice have narrowed the space for the country’s minority communities. The HRCP...
Deadly classrooms
Updated 16 Oct, 2026

Deadly classrooms

Parents should not have to become structural engineers to judge whether their children are safe at school.
Diplomatic options
Updated 16 Oct, 2026

Diplomatic options

Regional states know that the alternative to talks — a fully fledged war on both fronts — will bring immeasurable destruction to the Gulf, the Red Sea and the surrounding areas.
Hunger in Pakistan
16 Oct, 2026

Hunger in Pakistan

PAKISTAN’S position as the country most affected by hunger in South Asia is not surprising. An economy battered by...