BHC declares clauses of Quetta DHA Act unconstitutional

Published December 17, 2020
The Balochistan High Court (BHC) on Wednesday declared certain clauses of  the Defence Housing Authority (DHA) Act unconstitutional and null and void. — BHC website/File
The Balochistan High Court (BHC) on Wednesday declared certain clauses of the Defence Housing Authority (DHA) Act unconstitutional and null and void. — BHC website/File

QUETTA: The Balochistan High Court (BHC) on Wednesday declared certain clauses of the Defence Housing Authority (DHA) Act unconstitutional and null and void.

A BHC bench headed by Chief Justice Jamal Khan Mandokhail and also comprising Justice Naeem Akhtar Afghan, Justice Hashim Khan Kakar, Justice Abdul Hameed Baloch and Justice Abdullah Baloch announced the verdict after completing the hearing of a constitutional petition filed by lawyer Kashif Kakar challenging the DHA Act, 2015.

The chief justice read out the verdict after listening to the final arguments from both sides and declared Clauses 2-q, 6b 1-14 and 14b of the Quetta DHA Act, 2015, null and void, saying these clauses were in clash with the Constitution of Pakistan.

The bench also declared the permission granted to the executive board of the Quetta DHA for use of some specific area null and void.

The court also declared the permission granted for acquiring land for the Quetta DHA unconstitutional.

The judgement said that only the federal and provincial governments could acquire land in the interest of the people and the-then government had no authority to grant powers to any government or private institution for acquiring land.

The court said that instead of allowing a government institution, priority was given to a non-governmental institution for acquiring land. The judgement said the legislature had the right to legislate or amend a law but it should not clash with the clauses of the Constitution.

The court said the way legislation was done for the DHA Act shows the incompetence of the then government and members of the assembly.

Published in Dawn, December 17th, 2020

Opinion

Editorial

Online oppression
Updated 04 Dec, 2024

Online oppression

Plan to bring changes to Peca is simply another attempt to suffocate dissent. It shows how the state continues to prioritise control over real cybersecurity concerns.
The right call
04 Dec, 2024

The right call

AMIDST the ongoing tussle between the federal government and the main opposition party, several critical issues...
Acting cautiously
04 Dec, 2024

Acting cautiously

IT appears too big a temptation to ignore. The wider expectations for a steeper reduction in the borrowing costs...
Competing narratives
03 Dec, 2024

Competing narratives

Rather than hunting keyboard warriors, it would be better to support a transparent probe into reported deaths during PTI protest.
Early retirement
03 Dec, 2024

Early retirement

THE government is reportedly considering a proposal to reduce the average age of superannuation by five years to 55...
Being differently abled
03 Dec, 2024

Being differently abled

A SOCIETY comes of age when it does not normalise ‘othering’. As we observe the International Day of Persons ...