PHC sets aside 200 convictions by military courts

Published June 17, 2020
Issues short order for release of suspects. — AFP/File
Issues short order for release of suspects. — AFP/File

PESHAWAR: A Peshawar High Court (PHC) bench on Tuesday set aside convictions of around 200 suspected militants by military courts and ordered the relevant authorities to set them free if not required in any other case.

Most of these convicts were either sentenced to death or different prison terms including life sentence.

The PHC division bench comprising Chief Justice Waqar Ahmad Seth and Justice Mohammad Naeem Anwar pronounced a short order after completion of arguments by all parties in the cases.

A detailed judgement will be released later.

The court had accepted around 200 petitions filed by the convicts or their close family members from time to time, challenging their respective convictions by military courts in cases of terrorism and seeking their release.

The bench, however, adjourned hearing of around 100 petitions wherein the Ministry of Defence has yet to produce the relevant record.

Issues short order for release of suspects

The court had already granted interim relief to the convicts and stayed their executions on different dates.

The cases continued to linger on for around 20 months during which the government had frequently been challenging different orders of the high court before the Supreme Court.

Recently, the government reque­sted the apex court to stay the PHC proceedings till the Supreme Court decision on appeals filed against the earlier judgments of the high court. However, the Supreme Court turned down the government request, allowing the PHC to continue with the hearing of the petitions.

A number of lawyers appeared for the petitioners, including Shabbir Hussain Gigyani, Arif Jan, Ali Gohar Durrani, Naqeebullah Takkar, Ziaur Rehman Tajik, Danyal Asad Chamkani, Barrister Amirullah Chamkani, Naveed Akhtar and Sajeed Afridi.

Additional Attorney General for Pakistan Qazi Babar Irshad and Khyber Pakhtunkhwa Advocate General Shumail Ahmad Butt represented the federal and provincial governments, respectively.

The counsel for the petitioners had already submitted written arguments in accordance with an earlier court order.

Earlier on Oct 18, 2018, the PHC accepted 75 other writ petitions of military court convicts and had set aside their convictions and sentences, mostly including death penalties.

The SC on appeals later filed by the government suspended the said PHC judgement. The main appeals of the government had still been pending before the apex court.

During the course of hearing, the SC bench observed that the previous judgement of the PHC had been recognised by the International Court of Justice (ICJ) in Indian spy Kulbhushan Jadhav case after the federation of Pakistan had relied on that judgement.

In most of the cases, the counsel for the petitioners contended that their respective clients were taken into custody many years ago and kept incommunicado. They argued that after the convicts had remained missing for many years, their relatives came to know about their convictions through media reports.

Some of them claimed that they had been reported among missing persons before their family members came to know about their presence in internment centres later about their death sentence by military courts.

The petitioners contended that they were convicted without any evidence and on the basis of so-called confessional statements which were recorded contrary to provisions of law. Their counsel stated that while the convicts had remained in custody of security forces, their so-called confessions were recorded with delay of many years. They contended that malice on part of the government was clear in these cases, as none of the convicts were provided counsel of their choice and they were denied the right to a fair trial, which was contrary to Article 10-A of the Constitution.

Published in Dawn, June 17th, 2020*

Opinion

Lull before the storm
Updated 24 Oct 2021

Lull before the storm

It does not take rocket science to figure out why each of the two sides is taking the stand it is.
The larger debate
Updated 23 Oct 2021

The larger debate

The revelations show how the economy promotes inequality.

Editorial

Anti-government rallies
Updated 24 Oct 2021

Anti-government rallies

Banning a party because it can create a public nuisance sets a dangerous precedent which can be repeated to justify future bans.
24 Oct 2021

End of polio?

AFTER a long struggle, the reward is finally in sight. With only a single case of wild poliovirus reported this year...
24 Oct 2021

Heritage work

IT is encouraging that, slowly, projects of heritage conservation and preservation appear to be taking off. These...
A final push
Updated 23 Oct 2021

A final push

PAKISTAN’S hopes of exiting the so-called FATF grey list have been shattered once again. The global money...
23 Oct 2021

Kabul visit

FOREIGN MINISTER Shah Mahmood Qureshi’s flying visit to Kabul on Thursday is the first official high-level...
23 Oct 2021

Baqir’s blooper

THE remarks made by State Bank governor Reza Baqir at a London press conference have hit a raw nerve in Pakistan. In...