Govt response sought to candidate’s plea for appointment in IB

Published March 20, 2026 Updated March 20, 2026 07:31am

PESHAWAR: Peshawar High Court has issued notices to Federal Public Service Commission (FPSC) and federal government, seeking their response to plea of a candidate, who wants to be appointed in an intelligence agency on basis of ‘recommendations’ of the commission.

A bench consisting of Justice Ijaz Anwar and Justice Sadiq Ali issued the order after preliminary hearing of a petition filed by a candidate Mohammad Afaq, seeking directives for the government to issue his appointment order against post of assistant director (BPS-17) in Intelligence Bureau.

The petitioner requested that his appointment might be made with back benefits with effect from the date as his fellow colleagues were appointed.

Advocate Mian Zakir Hussain appeared for the petitioner and said that his client had secured distinctive position both in written test as well as in interview and after due verification, scrutiny and completion of all codal formalities had been recommended by FPSC for appointment against the post of assistant director (BPS-17) in the office of IB.

He stated that after securing place in the merit list, a verification process including issuance of police clearance certificate was also conducted by the respondents. He added that belonging to a respectable family of Kohat, the petitioner had no adverse record.

He argued that by virtue of articles 4 and 25 of the Constitution, the petitioner should be treated in accordance with law and should not be discriminated.

The lawyer said that once the commission recommended the petitioner for the appointment then there was no other mandate with the respondents except to issue appointment letter, which had been illegally and unlawfully withheld without any legal justification.

He contended that any re-advertisement would affect petitioner’s rights. He stated that in the light of a recent judgement of Supreme Court, non-issuance of appointment letter after a candidate being recommended by the commission or competent authority without any legal justifications was illegal and could not take away the right of the petitioner to his appointment except in accordance with law.

The counsel requested the court to restrain the respondents including FPSC, federal government and IB, from re-advertising the positions and to keep one vacant post for the petitioner till the final disposal of the writ petition.

Published in Dawn, March 20th, 2026

Opinion

Editorial

Sombre Eid
20 Mar, 2026

Sombre Eid

INSTEAD of exchanging greetings on Eidul Fitr this year, thousands of families across Iran, Lebanon and Gaza will be...
Pakistan’s right
Updated 20 Mar, 2026

Pakistan’s right

THE US director of national intelligence, Tulsi Gabbard, recently made uncalled-for comments regarding Pakistan’s...
Weathering the storm
20 Mar, 2026

Weathering the storm

KARACHI’S severe overnight storm once again exposed how fragile the city’s infrastructure is. Though the ...
Larijani’s killing
Updated 19 Mar, 2026

Larijani’s killing

The late Larijani was one of the most powerful men in Iran — a thinker and a soldier.
War’s hunger toll
19 Mar, 2026

War’s hunger toll

THE conflict between the US, Israel and Iran continues to widen with far-reaching repercussions.The UN’s World ...
Let them in
Updated 19 Mar, 2026

Let them in

THE government need not be so difficult. Former prime minister Imran Khan’s sons, Kasim and Sulaiman, have not ...