BUILDING owners often chase short-term gains during construction, flouting rules as the civic agency looks the other way.

Every time a disaster strikes, experts raise alarms and the agency vows action. Then some more days go, the dust settles, and everything returns to the old, perilous rhythm.

After last Friday’s 5.7-magnitude earthquake, which caused at least four deaths in Dhaka, experts warned that far greater losses await if the authorities fail to act now.

According to the Dhaka district administration, at least 14 buildings in the capital sustained damage from the quake, while the Rajdhani Unnayan Kartr­ipakkha (Rajuk) put the number at over 50.

“We are still working. Many more buildings will be identified,” Rajuk Chairman Md Riazul Islam told The Daily Star over the weekend.

Most of the buildings, identified by the civic agency as requiring retrofitting, are government-owned

He said the next step was an immediate assessment of all buildings in Dhaka, at least those under the Detailed Area Plan (DAP), to determine which structures cannot withstand even minor shocks.

Rajuk is, by mandate, responsible for monitoring buildings from planning through construction and ensuring that rules are followed thereafter.

Criticising the agency for chronic failures, Professor Munaz Ahmed Noor, vice president of the Bangladesh Earthquake Society, said Rajuk “always wakes up after a major incident”, largely because it lacks the manpower for sustained oversight.

Prof Munaz said everyone should follow the building code very strictly when constructing any structure.

In the past, the National Building Code was neither properly regulated nor enforced, which led many buildings to be identified as vulnerable in the Comprehensive Disaster Mana­gement (CDM) Survey, he said.

“The loads used in design must be applied correctly, and after the design is completed, the detailing must also be done properly. This is often where major negligence occurs. Sometimes the design is done correctly, but the reinforcement is not placed as detailed in the drawings,” he added.

Prof Mehedi Ahmed Ansary of BUET’s civil engineering department stressed that damaged buildings must be examined immediately and prioritised based on risk.

“Some buildings have column damage, others none. We need clear segmentation to decide what must be done first,” he said.

He warned that a stronger earthquake could cause far more devastating collapses. “If we act now, we can prevent greater losses.”

He suggested Rajuk issue notices or newspaper advertisements instructing homeowners to assess their buildings and submit reports. Experts could then guide the next steps.

Although the number of visibly damaged structures remains limited, he said many across Dhaka likely suffered some degree of structural impact.

No action on risky buildings

In 2022, the Rajuk identified 42 buildings in Dhaka, Gazipur, and Narayanganj as being at immediate risk and ordered them vacated and demolished within three months. It also listed 187 structures requiring retrofitting. Most have seen no progress.

The high-risk buildings belong to several government and autonomous bodies, including the Education Engineering Depa­rtment, Department of Health Education, LGED, Jagannath University, Dhaka University, Bangladesh Madrasah Education Board, the Institute of Leather Technology, and the Bangladesh Medical University hospital. They were flagged during a survey of 3,252 structures under the Urban Resilience Project.

Asked about these buildings, the Rajuk chairman said most were government-owned, and that a citywide reassessment was essential.

He said risky buildings were now being listed, sealed, or cleared as needed.

“This earthquake is a major warning. Science suggests a bigger shock may be ahead,” he said.

He added that the work must be collaborative, involving Rajuk, city corporations, disaster management authorities, the army, and the fire service.

“We are disconnecting the utility meters of those constructing illegally. Some keep constructing using stolen meters or generators,” Riazul said.

He urged owners to consider demolishing unsafe or ageing structures on small plots and then rebuilding jointly. “Com­bining plots may mean short-term losses, but it brings long-term benefits.”

Published in Dawn, November 24th, 2025