Trust in judiciary

Published October 31, 2024

ROSTER fixation in high courts refers to the process by which judges are assigned to deal with specific types of cases or areas of law. The primary goal of roster fixation is to streamline the judicial process, improve efficiency, and enhance the quality of judgments by matching cases with judges who possess relevant knowledge and experience.

Recently, I appeared before a judge of a provincial high court who had specialised in corporate cases and those in the field of intellectual property law.

According to the roster, the said judge was hearing cases involving civil appeals, revisions and miscellaneous applications.

During the proceedings, I had to perform two roles: representing my client, and informing the judge about well-settled legal principles of civil law. The judge was generally not satisfied with the arguments presented by the advocates. When judges are not satisfied with the arguments, the parties ultimately suffer, leading to a miscarriage of justice, which, in turn, adds to the backlog in the Supreme Court against such decisions.

When appointing judges to a high court, there should be a thorough evaluation of their academic and professional backgr-ounds, elevating those who have exper-ience across various areas of law. Such judges should be placed on every roster to ensure justice for the parties involved in litigation.

Neither the Supreme Court nor the high courts have any law addressing the accountability of their own institutions. These institutions, which are supposed to teach the entire nation lessons on acco-untability through their judgments, fall short in this regard.

Therefore, competent and dedicated judges who strive to transform the system may feel reluctant to do so due to the poor policy on roster fixation.

The reputation and conduct of judges significantly impact public trust. A transparent roster fixation policy can bolster the people’s trust in the system. It will allow stakeholders to understand how the judges are assigned, and will also ensure accountability in the process.

Abdul Samee Sohoo
Karachi

Published in Dawn, October 31st, 2024

Opinion

Editorial

Chinese diplomacy
Updated 14 Mar, 2026

Chinese diplomacy

THERE are signs that China is taking a more active role in trying to resolve the issue of cross-border terrorism...
Fragile gains at risk
14 Mar, 2026

Fragile gains at risk

PAKISTAN is confronting an external shock stemming from the US-Israel war on Iran that few of the other affected...
Kidney disease
14 Mar, 2026

Kidney disease

ON World Kidney Day this past Thursday, the Pakistan Medical Association raised the alarm on Pakistan’s...
Delicate balance
Updated 13 Mar, 2026

Delicate balance

PAKISTAN has to maintain a delicate balance where the geopolitics of the US-Israeli aggression against Iran are...
Soaring costs
13 Mar, 2026

Soaring costs

FOR millions of households already grappling with Ramazan inflation, the sharp increase in petrol and diesel prices...
Perilous lines
13 Mar, 2026

Perilous lines

THE law minister’s veiled warning to the media to “exercise caution” and not cross “red lines” while...