Push and pull

Published October 13, 2024

MUCH remains at stake, but it is nonetheless reassuring that our politicians have returned to more parliamentary means of doing business. After the failure of its midnight ‘constitutional coup’ last month, the government had remanded its proposed constitutional amendments to a parliamentary committee for further debate and consideration by the leaders of opposition political parties. Back and forth over the proposed ‘constitutional package’, which is expected to be tabled in the coming days, continued, with the ruling coalition and opposition parties engaging in terse exchanges over what should and should not be included in the package. According to proposals presented on the government’s behalf, it is clear that the ruling parties have not reconsidered their widely criticised decision to supplant the Supreme Court with a ‘federal constitutional court’, to be led by a judge of their choosing. The JUI-F, on Saturday, has now proposed a ‘constitutional bench’ within the Supreme Court instead, to be led by serving justices. If an agreement on this point can be reached, the JUI-F has suggested, it may be willing to support the government on its planned amendments.

The ruling coalition insists, despite not having enough lawmakers, that it can muster the numbers needed to enact a constitutional amendment bill. Observers have pointed out that the recent annulment of the Supreme Court’s earlier interpretation of Article 63-A has made it easier to rope in votes from the opposition. Continued uncertainty over whether the reserved seats denied to the PTI will be apportioned to it has complicated the picture. Still, PPP chairman Bilawal Bhutto-Zardari, who has been negotiating on behalf of the government, says that he would rather proceed with consensus. That is appreciable, but it must be asked why the nation, in whose name these amendments are supposedly being moved, has still not been fully looped in. Why is it that the government is not arguing for its legislative package before the public as well? To this, no one seems to have a coherent answer. The government’s plans should not continue to be debated behind closed doors, not when the future of the democracy is at stake. It must not use its power and resources to complete its numbers: if it respects Pakistani democracy, it should let the chips fall where they may.

Published in Dawn, October 13th, 2024

Opinion

Beefing up security

Beefing up security

The issue lies not in the sincerity and dedication of Pakistan’s law enforcement but in their capacity and access to effective surveillance equipment.

Editorial

Concerning measures
Updated 03 Nov, 2024

Concerning measures

The govt must seek political input and consensus on the changes it is seeking to make and be open about its intentions.
Short-lived relief?
03 Nov, 2024

Short-lived relief?

POLICYMAKERS must be jumping with joy. At the close of the first quarter of FY25, the budget posted a consolidated...
Brisk spread
03 Nov, 2024

Brisk spread

THE surge in polio cases has reached distressing levels with a tally of 45 last reported, after two cases emerged in...
Ultimate price
Updated 02 Nov, 2024

Ultimate price

To dismantle culture of impunity for crimes against journalists, state must ensure that perpetrators do not go unpunished.
Mastung bombing
02 Nov, 2024

Mastung bombing

INSTABILITY continues to haunt Balochistan, as Friday morning’s bombing in Mastung has shown. At least nine...
Plane speak
02 Nov, 2024

Plane speak

DESPITE all its efforts to facilitate PIA’s privatisation, it seems the government only ended up being taken for a...