PTI’s request for restraining order in funding case dismissed

Published June 10, 2022
Islamabad High Court (IHC) Chief Justice Athar Minallah — Photo via IHC website/File
Islamabad High Court (IHC) Chief Justice Athar Minallah — Photo via IHC website/File

ISLAMABAD: The Islam­abad High Court (IHC) on Thu­r­sday declined the request of the Pakistan Tehreek-i-Insaf to issue a restraining order in the foreign funding case.

PTI’s additional general secretary Amir Mehmood Kiani filed the petition before the IHC against Election Commi­ssion of Pakistan’s proceedings related to the foreign funding case and issuance of a show-cause notice by the commission.

An IHC division bench comprising Chief Justice Athar Minallah and Justice Babar Sattar heard the petition.

PTI counsel Anwar Mansoor Khan argued that that issuance of the show-cause notice is likely to adversely affect the petitioner party if other political parties are not treated at par.

In response to the court’s query, the ECP representative stated that the pending proceedings would follow the procedure prescribed under rule 6 of the Political Parties Rules, 2002, provided the commission is satisfied that sufficient material is available to issue a show-cause notice.

The court noted that the ECP has been established under the Constitution of the Islamic Republic of Pakistan, 1973 and it is competent to regulate its own proceedings.

“The PTI’s counsel may raise the same concerns on behalf of the political party before the Commission and we see no reason why they would not be considered so as to ensure level playing field for all the parties”, observed the bench.

“We repose our confidence in the Commission and we have no reason to doubt that the legitimate rights of the petitioner party will not be safeguarded,” the bench further observed.

The court however asked the commission not to pass any adv­erse order against PTI at this stage because the ECP, after concluding the pending pro­ceedings, would be req­u­i­red to consider whether or not to issue a show-cause notice under rule 6 of the Rules of 2002.

The court subsequently disposed of the petition.

Published in Dawn, June 10th, 2022

Opinion

Editorial

New terror wave
Updated 27 Mar, 2024

New terror wave

The time has come for decisive government action against militancy.
Development costs
27 Mar, 2024

Development costs

A HEFTY escalation of 30pc in the cost of ongoing federal development schemes is one of the many decisions where the...
Aitchison controversy
Updated 27 Mar, 2024

Aitchison controversy

It is hoped that higher authorities realise that politics and nepotism have no place in schools.
Ceasefire, finally
Updated 26 Mar, 2024

Ceasefire, finally

Palestinian lives matter, and a generation of orphaned Gazan children will be looking to the world community to secure justice for them.
Afghan return
26 Mar, 2024

Afghan return

FOLLOWING a controversial first repatriation phase involving ‘illegal’ Afghan refugees last November, the...
Planes and plans
26 Mar, 2024

Planes and plans

FOR the past many years, PIA has been getting little by way of good press, mostly on account of internal...