LAHORE: The Lahore High Court has suspended a criminal case lodged by the Federal Board of Revenue (FBR) against a sugar mills on charges of tax fraud amounting to millions of rupees.

SW Sugar Mills through a writ petition challenged the FIR registered by the Inland Revenue Department of the FBR for being an act beyond its jurisdiction.

Defending the FIR, department’s legal adviser Zainul Abideen argued that the mill committed a huge tax fraud by suppressing the sales and actual stock of sugar. He said the assessment of tax and completion of assessment proceedings were not prerequisite for initiation of a criminal action.

He said as per settled principles of law, civil and criminal proceedings could be initiated side by side and the impugned FIR was not liable to be quashed. Representing the mill, Advocate Ijaz Awan argued that the FIR had been lodged with ulterior motives by unlawfully converting civil proceedings into criminal.

He stated that in the absence of tax assessment under the Sales Tax Act 1990 and without knowing the amount/loss involved neither compound-ability was possible nor the award of sentence was justifiable in any manner. He said directly resorting to criminal proceedings was not the mandate of the sales tax act as mandatory prerequisites had been blatantly ignored by the respondent before lodging the impugned FIR.

The counsel pointed out that the issue in hand had already been settled by two-judge bench of the high court in a 2014 judgment titled “Taj International verses FBR & others”. The instant petition should also be decided in the light of that judgment, added the counsel.

However, Justice Sajid Mahmood Sethi observed that the judgment cited by the petitioner’s counsel was under challenge before the Supreme Court and the respondent/FBR had also not initiated any recovery proceedings by issuing a show-cause notice to the petitioner/mill.

The judge disposed of the petition ruling that the operation of the impugned FIR shall remain stayed till decision either by the Supreme Court or determination of due amount through adjudication process by the respondent department through show-cause notice.

Published in Dawn, March 8th, 2019

Opinion

Editorial

Token austerity
Updated 11 Mar, 2026

Token austerity

The ‘austerity’ measures are a ritualistic response to public anger rather than a sincere attempt to reform state spending.
Lebanon on fire
11 Mar, 2026

Lebanon on fire

WHILE the entire Gulf region has become an active warzone, repercussions of this conflict have spread to the...
Canine crisis
11 Mar, 2026

Canine crisis

KARACHI’S stray dog crisis requires urgent attention. Feral canines can cause serious and lasting physical and...
Iran’s new leader
Updated 10 Mar, 2026

Iran’s new leader

The position is the most powerful in Iran, bringing together clerical authority and political and ideological leadership.
National priorities
10 Mar, 2026

National priorities

EVEN as the country faces heightened risks of attacks from actual terrorists, an anti-terrorism court in Rawalpindi...
Silenced march
10 Mar, 2026

Silenced march

ON the eve of International Women’s Day, Islamabad Police detained dozens of Aurat March activists who had ...