Gerry Adams ‘categorically’ denies IRA links

Published March 18, 2026 Updated March 18, 2026 07:27am

LONDON: Former Irish republican leader Gerry Adams on Tuesday “categorically” denied allegations in a London civil trial brought by three IRA bomb victims seeking to hold him personally responsible for the attacks.

Adams led Sinn Fein, the Irish Republican Army’s former political wing, during the Troubles — the three-decades-long violent sectarian conflict over British rule in Northern Ireland.

His role as its president during the Troubles, which largely ended after a 1998 peace accord, made him a hated figure for many Protestants in the British province. But Adams has always denied being a member of the IRA, a statement that he repeated multiple times at the High Court in London.

It was the first time the 77-year-old — who has been embroiled in several legal spats over his role in the Troubles — has testified in an English court. He is being sued by John Clark, a victim of a 1973 IRA attack on London’s Old Bailey courthouse, as well as Jonathan Ganesh and Barry Laycock, who were injured in IRA attacks in 1996 at London’s Docklands and in Manchester, respectively.

Three people died in the three bombings, and scores more were injured. The claimants are suing for symbolic damage of one pound for “vindicatory purposes”. They accuse him of “directing” the 1973 and 1996 attacks.

“To be clear, I had no involvement in or advance knowledge” of the bombings, Adams said in a written witness statement. “Although I deny categorically the allegations made by the claimants of my involvement in those bombings in any way, nothing in this statement should be taken as criticism of the claimants,” he added.

The three claimants allege that Adams was a senior IRA figure for over 25 years who “acted with others in furtherance of a common design to bomb the British mainland”.

“These allegations are untrue. I was never a member of the IRA or its Army Council,” Adams said in his witness statement. “I do not defend all the IRA actions,” Adams told the Royal Courts of Justice. But “people have the right to resist occupation,” he said.

Published in Dawn, March 18th, 2026

Opinion

Editorial

Exit strategy
Updated 18 Mar, 2026

Exit strategy

MOST members of the international community, particularly states in the greater Middle East, are gravely concerned...
Unsafe trains
18 Mar, 2026

Unsafe trains

SUNDAY’S accident involving the Shalimar Express has once again brought into sharp focus the deep structural and...
Disappointment in Dhaka
18 Mar, 2026

Disappointment in Dhaka

FOR a side looking for lift-off after a disappointing T20 World Cup, it was despair for Shaheen Shah Afridi’s ...
Missing in action
17 Mar, 2026

Missing in action

NOT exactly known for playing a proactive role in protecting the interests of Muslim nations and populations...
Risk to stability
Updated 17 Mar, 2026

Risk to stability

THE risks to Pakistan’s fragile economic recovery from the US-Israel war on Iran cannot be dismissed. Yet the...
Enrolment push
17 Mar, 2026

Enrolment push

THE federal government has embarked upon the welcome initiative to enrol 25,000 out-of-school children in Islamabad...