Judge vows to continue missing person’s case

Published
1
Islamabad High Court (IHC) Justice Mohsin Akhtar Kayani. — File photo
Islamabad High Court (IHC) Justice Mohsin Akhtar Kayani. — File photo

• Father of missing youth protests delays, claims authorities ‘waiting for Justice Kayani’s transfer’
• Ministry given final chance to give in-camera briefing
• Govt tells court it has issued Rs5m compensation cheque

ISLAMABAD: Amid speculation regarding his possible transfer from the Islamabad High Court (IHC), Justice Mohsin Akhtar Kayani on Tuesday made it clear that he would continue to preside over the case of a missing citizen, reaffirming his resolve to proceed with the contempt petition linked to the enforced disappearance of Abdullah Omar.

During the hearing, tensions escalated in the court when the father of the missing youth, Khalid Abbasi, strongly protested over the prolonged delay.

“So much time has passed; they are only waiting for your transfer,” he alleged, adding that all avenues of justice had been closed for the family.

Justice Kayani responded that he had no objection to being transfer­red, noting that if it happened, an­­other judge would continue the proceedings. “Someone else will come and hear this case,” he remarked.

The judge once again granted the Ministry of Defence and other relevant agencies a final opportunity to present an in-camera briefing in the contempt proceedings filed by Zainab Zaeem, the wife of missing citizen Abdullah Omar, over the lack of progress in recovering his body.

The representative of the Ministry of Defence reiterated that the abducted man was not in the custody of any defence agency.

The court ordered the ministry and the federal government to furnish an in-camera briefing regarding the missing citizen. The hearing was adjourned until January.

Assistant Attorney General Usman Ghumman informed the court that the government had already issued a compensation cheque of Rs5 million to the family. He added that the officials previously fined in the case had since retired and therefore could not be penalised.

Issuing a stern warning, Justice Kayani said that failure to implement the court’s earlier order by the next hearing would entail “serious consequences.”

The 27th Amendment allows the JCP to transfer a judge from one high court to another without his consent.

Published in Dawn, November 26th, 2025

Opinion

Editorial

Narrative confusion
Updated 14 Oct, 2026

Narrative confusion

The centre must say clearly how long it intends it to last, what it hopes to achieve in that time, and how the province’s elected mandate will be restored.
El Niño’s long reach
14 Oct, 2026

El Niño’s long reach

THE extraordinary El Niño gathering strength in the Pacific could make 2026 the hottest year on record, with 2027...
Deeper poverty
Updated 14 Oct, 2026

Deeper poverty

PAKISTAN’S poverty crisis is far deeper than official indicators suggest. While the government celebrates economic...
Yemen escalation
Updated 13 Oct, 2026

Yemen escalation

Such an agreement can also help bring peace to Saudi Arabia, while ending Yemen’s humanitarian nightmare.
Inequitable taxation
13 Oct, 2026

Inequitable taxation

FINANCE Minister Muhammad Aurangzeb has once more reviewed the latest incentive scheme to bring retailers into the...
Taxila’s hidden past
13 Oct, 2026

Taxila’s hidden past

A HILL dismissed more than a century ago as an unremarkable heap of ruins has yielded one of Taxila’s most...