IT was the wrong call for the International Cricket Council to make. On Monday, the ICC’s spokesperson revealed that it had granted the Board of Control for Cricket in India’s request to allow Indian cricketers to wear army camouflage-style caps during a recent ODI, a stunt that sparked controversy over the weekend as Pakistani government and cricket officials rightly criticised this blatant politicisation of the game.

The ICC explicitly prohibits any form of attire that conveys messages “political, religious or racial” in nature.

To claim that this was merely a “fundraising drive and in memory of” the Indian-occupying troops killed in Pulwama, as Indian skipper Virat Kohli and the ICC have stated, is a rather clumsy smokescreen, and extremely irresponsible given the silly season of war-mongering hysteria in India against Pakistan at this time. But no matter the extent of national fervour, a cricket field is not a battlefield.

That the ICC authorised this spectacle, in clear violation of its own rules, when it has previously reprimanded cricketers for far more minor dress code violations, as well as shown leniency towards other violations by Indian players (recall ‘Monkeygate’) in general, is indicative of India’s ever-growing influence over the world of cricket. It is an ingress that has led to an imbalance in how the ICC arbitrates in such issues.

If it is to maintain any credibility as an international governing body, it must formally reassess this decision and reassert the primacy of its code of conduct. Moreover, this moment also demands that Indian athletes and artists consider the broader implications of adopting the rhetoric of ultra-nationalism and the aesthetics of warfare.

Such personalities have always enjoyed immense power to determine public opinion, an influence which should ostensibly be used to advocate for peace by building bridges rather than burning them down.

And while that sometimes justifies rules against politicising sports being broken in favour of taking a conscientious stand, it takes no moral courage to don the cap of jingoism and cosy up to power.

Published in Dawn, March 13th, 2019


Long arm of Big Tech
20 Jan 2021

Long arm of Big Tech

How many people would still be alive if Twitter and Facebook had denied Trump a platform to spread lies about Covid-19 a year ago?
Words, words, words
19 Jan 2021

Words, words, words

There was little in terms of contributions in our own language as we wrestled with the pandemic.


Updated 20 Jan 2021

Broadsheet judgement

There are plenty of skeletons in the Broadsheet cupboard and they must be brought out into the open.
20 Jan 2021

Unequal justice

IT seems no one wants to testify against former SSP Malir, Rao Anwar. At least five prosecution witnesses, all ...
20 Jan 2021

Schools reopening

THE disruptive impact of Covid-19 on education will be felt for years to come. For countries like Pakistan, where...
Updated 19 Jan 2021

LNG contracts

It is important for industry to reconnect with the national grid and for gas to be allocated for more efficient uses.
19 Jan 2021

Murdered judges

THE continuous violence in Afghanistan has raised serious questions about the sustainability of the peace process, ...
19 Jan 2021

K2 feat

A TEAM of 10 Nepalese mountaineers made history over the weekend as they scaled the world’s second highest peak K2...