OUT of ulterior motives, some Western countries seem to be joining hands to counter the Belt and Road Initiative.

At the 54th Munich Security Conference, German Foreign Minister Sigmar Gabriel rejected the China-proposed initiative, saying that it is not in the interests of democracy or freedom, and that the West needs to offer an alternative. Gabriel said China was using the initiative’s infrastructure fund to promote a value system different from the West, and the European Union should launch its own initiative to promote the development of infrastructure from Eastern Europe to Central Asia and also in Africa, with European money, and with European standards. Gabriel’s sentiments were backed by European Commission President Jean-Claude Juncker and French Prime Minister Édouard Philippe, who both spoke of growing challenges to Western liberalism at the conference.

Yet in an earlier visit to China, French President Emmanuel Macron promised to work with China on the Belt and Road Initiative, although he recalled the French colonial experience in Africa and urged China not to turn the initiative into a new form of hegemony that could make host countries China’s vassals.

It is not European countries alone that have voiced concerns about China’s Belt and Road Initiative, the United States, Australia, Japan and India have also said recently they will join hands to create an alternative regardless of China reiterating on numerous occasions that the initiative aims to realise strategic synergy with other countries, not to overthrow the established order.

No need for West to cast doubt on initiative

In its advancement of the Belt and Road Initiative, China, through policy coordination with other countries, strives to achieve the effect of “one plus one being greater than two” and promote lasting peace, common security, common prosperity, openness and inclusiveness, and shared and sustainable development. China is willing to share with other countries its development experience, but it will not interfere in the internal affairs of other countries.

China will neither introduce foreign models nor export its own model and never demand other countries copy its practices. By advancing the Belt and Road Initiative, China is not repeating the old geopolitical games, but instead offering a new win-win cooperation model. The initiative will not destabilise world peace and stability but contribute to the building of a big world family of harmonious coexistence.

Behind Western unease about the Belt and Road Initiative is their misunderstanding and disapproval of the China’s model and their all-out attempt not to abandon their self-righteous universal values. Problems-and goals-guided, China’s model aims to promote a perfect combination between a functioning government and an efficient market, in which the visible and invisible hands both play their roles, but the market plays the decisive role. Such a model will offer countries whose market economy has not been fully developed an all-new option in the pursuit of industrialisation and will help them resolve the problems which the West’s free market formula cannot resolve.

Due to the lack of self-confidence in their own development model, Western countries have showed great anxiety over the competition from China’s development model in recent years and this has been extended to the Belt and Road Initiative, as partially reflected by the different approaches between Europe and China toward globalisation.

Disapproving of the Chinese development model and its popularisation, the West views the Belt and Road Initiative as China’s strategy to rewrite international rules and change the existing regional and international order, and acquire regional and global dominance.

West will lose chance because of fear of China

In stark contrast with Western countries, the massive developing and non-core Western countries extensively welcome the Chinese initiative and hope to benefit from China’s fast economic development.

Since the Belt and Road Initiative was first raised, China, through consultation on an equal basis, has signed 101 cooperative agreements with 86 countries and international organisations, carried out regular capacity cooperation with more than 30 countries, built 75 economic and trade zones with 24 countries along the routes, and made a cumulative investment of $50 billion in involved countries, creating nearly 200,000 jobs.

All this, a full demonstration of the initiative’s mutual beneficial and win-win essence, can explain why the initiative has received warm support and welcome among the involved countries and wider international community. The Belt and Road initiative will bring some changes, it will push globalisation to evolve in a more open, inclusive, balanced, mutually-reciprocal and sustainable direction.

Given that China enjoys huge advantages in infrastructure construction, the advancement of the Belt and Road Initiative will surely boost connectivity between China and the rest of the world. China is not opposed to but welcomes the US working with allies to launch their own infrastructure construction programmes in other countries.

The largest risk to the Belt and Road Initiative comes from Western countries, with their groundless doubts over funds, standards, geopolitics, transparency, procurements and other issues. But only when Western misgivings over China’s development model disappear, will their doubts over the Belt and Road Initiative disappear as well.

As the Belt and Road Initiative irreversibly advances, the West risks losing not only China but the world if it misses the opportunities being created by the initiative.--China Daily

Published in Dawn, February 28th, 2018

Opinion

Civil liberties
23 Oct 2021

Civil liberties

The late I.A. Rehman is esteemed on both sides of the border.
The Hamza factor
Updated 23 Oct 2021

The Hamza factor

A new story is quietly unfolding inside the PML-N and there may yet be a surprise twist.
What should Imran Khan do?
Updated 23 Oct 2021

What should Imran Khan do?

Making a mishmash of religion and politics won’t turn Pakistan into a welfare state. Here’s what can.
Afghan health crises
Updated 22 Oct 2021

Afghan health crises

The condition and prospects of Afghanistan’s health sector are complex and grave.

Editorial

A final push
Updated 23 Oct 2021

A final push

PAKISTAN’S hopes of exiting the so-called FATF grey list have been shattered once again. The global money...
23 Oct 2021

Kabul visit

FOREIGN MINISTER Shah Mahmood Qureshi’s flying visit to Kabul on Thursday is the first official high-level...
23 Oct 2021

Baqir’s blooper

THE remarks made by State Bank governor Reza Baqir at a London press conference have hit a raw nerve in Pakistan. In...
Spate of attacks
Updated 22 Oct 2021

Spate of attacks

Following a near-constant decline since 2016, the year 2021 has witnessed a precipitous rise in violence-related fatalities in KP.
22 Oct 2021

Libel suits

THE outcome of two libel cases recently decided by courts in England should be edifying for the government — if it...
22 Oct 2021

Education losses

A NEW report on the education losses suffered by Pakistani children due to pandemic-induced school closures sheds...