Khawar Qureshi represented India once in US case

Published
92

NEW DELHI: There is a bit of history to the hyped fight between two legal ex­­perts — Harish Salve for India and Khawar Qureshi for Pakistan — in the Inter­national Court of Justice (ICJ), which is seized with the Kulbhushan Jadhav case.

At the moment Salve seems to have the upper hand in the case, with the ICJ staying Jadhav’s possible execution until a final judgement on the matter.

More than 15 years ago, there was a curious turn of events when India was forced to face arbitration at an international tribunal in the US initiated by Enron over the closure of the Dab­hol power project. Millions of dollars were at stake for India. Salve, who had quit as solicitor general of India in November 2002, was retained as India’s counsel at the arbitration tribunal.

In 2004, the UPA government came to power as also a new team of law officers headed by attorney general Milon Banerjee. To manage the high-stakes arbitration over Dabhol against Enron, the government chose the Fox and Mandal law firm.

Government sources said Salve was sounded out whe­ther he would continue as India’s counsel in the arbitration proceedings. Salve confirmed and informed the new government that he would continue to charge a concessional fee of Rs100,000 for a day’s hearing in the US-based tribunal.

Read more: ICJ stays Jadhav's execution, says it has jurisdiction in case brought by India

However, there was a sudden change of heart and the Fox and Mandal firm was asked to hire Khawar Qure­shi. India ultimately lost on both counts, the case to Enron and a lot of money that was paid to Qureshi as fees.

Salve confirmed to the Times of India that he had agreed to fight the case for India in the tribunal despite change of government. “It was a professional decision to defend India in the tribunal. But, I learnt from media reports later that Qureshi was hired and I could be­come his deputy.... So I decided to keep away, wishing India the best.” Salve refused to divulge any more details of how he was replaced by Qureshi in 2004.

Explore: Experts wonder why ICJ jurisdiction was recognised in March

An article from 2004 in The Lawyer, states that Serle Court chambers’ lawyer Qureshi had been appointed as counsel for the government of India. A host of UK firms had been invited to take India’s case.

A spokesperson for the previous law firm had said: “Following the appointment of the new attorney general, the entire legal team... was replaced.”

By arrangement with the Times of India

Published in Dawn, May 22nd, 2017

Opinion

Editorial

Privatisation framework
Updated 27 Oct, 2026

Privatisation framework

The new arrangement offers an opportunity to improve the management of state assets and infrastructure investment.
Chromebook scheme
27 Oct, 2026

Chromebook scheme

THE government’s plan to distribute 500,000 Chromebooks to students over two years could help narrow Pakistan’s...
Dengue season
27 Oct, 2026

Dengue season

ANOTHER dengue outbreak looms over the country for reasons of lack of preparedness and negligence. This month’s...
Wheat price dilemma
Updated 26 Oct, 2026

Wheat price dilemma

A price no buyer is obliged or financially equipped to pay is only a number. Growers seem to have grasped this before the government did.
Encounter culture
Updated 26 Oct, 2026

Encounter culture

Whether police actions in "encounters" were legitimate or unlawful can only be established through credible investigations.
Recognising distress
26 Oct, 2026

Recognising distress

THE deaths of two families in Karachi, being investigated as suspected murder-suicides, raise disturbing questions...