Tell me if you’ve seen this movie: two spies, posing as a couple, betrayed after a successful mission, land in the middle of nowhere, presumed dead. The spies, already being a couple, with the woman spy announcing her pregnancy, decide to elope from the world-saving business, settling into a suburban life with children, only to be brought back to action when their family’s identity is compromised.

Ok, so one may not have seen exactly this movie, but crafting such a routine, cookie-cutter story doesn’t exactly equate to putting one’s brain cells to work (the writers are Seth Gordon and Brendan O’Brien; Gordon is also the director).

Nevertheless, the plot seemed to have retinkled Cameron Diaz’s fancy, prompting her return to acting (her co-star, Jamie Foxx, never said adieu to his well-paying job), so technically this is Diaz’s Back in Action… only, one can only call this a warm-up job.

Diaz’s last film, 2014’s Annie, also starred Foxx, so I guess this also serves as a good reunion of sorts.

Foxx is adequate and also near-invisible as the husband-spy Matt. The film is, however, without a doubt, designed to give Diaz the spotlight, despite not giving her much material to shine with; one assumes that Diaz is, perhaps, doing the heavy-lifting by herself. Glenn Close, as her estranged mother — a Brit who is also a former spy, and is now “training” a younger man-cum-lover to be a spy — is also good enough. No one is a hoot in the film, though.

Back in Action is a vehicle for the return of Cameron Diaz and that’s about it

Their children, represented by the cliched wild-child teenage daughter (McKenna Roberts) and techie and inexplicably ailing son (Rylan Jackson) are duds as characters and uninteresting as actors. Kyle Chandler is also dealt a bad hand as Diaz and Foxx’s former good-guy boss; also, I hope Andrew Scott’s cheque is worthwhile, because his role, and how he is directed, is truly a crime (Scott, a brilliant actor, played Moriarty in Benedict Cumberbatch’s Sherlock serial).

Nevertheless, even by Netflix’s standards (their original film productions never look as high-end), Back in Action looks and moves like a semi-expensive actioner. The predictability will trigger yawns, but the stars — well, Diaz — hold the film just fine, irrespective of the mediocrity. It is a so-so watch, if you have time to burn away.

Released by Netflix, produced by Peter Chernin, Jenno Topping, Sharla Sumpter, Bridgett Beau Bauman and Seth Gordon, Back in Action is rated PG-13 and, as of right now, holds its position at the top of Netflix charts… like all mediocre films do

Published in Dawn, ICON, February 2nd, 2025

Opinion

Editorial

Window dressing
Updated 17 Jun, 2025

Window dressing

Meanwhile, the provinces lack the resources and expertise to implement adaptation measures effectively.
No revenue effort
17 Jun, 2025

No revenue effort

WITH the ruling PML-N’s next budget unfolding large infrastructure schemes, and expenditure focusing on service...
Pomp and circumstance
17 Jun, 2025

Pomp and circumstance

THE sight of columns of tanks rolling down a boulevard, accompanied by troops goose-stepping in lockstep, was a...
Close the gap
Updated 16 Jun, 2025

Close the gap

Our imbalanced scorecard in the main shows that power development and prosperity reflect the shallowness of political claims.
Fiscal malfeasance
16 Jun, 2025

Fiscal malfeasance

IT is galling that, even in these times of economic distress, when hardship has pushed millions of ordinary...
Rochdale conviction
16 Jun, 2025

Rochdale conviction

THE recent conviction of seven men in the Rochdale grooming gang case is a hard-won moment of justice. The men, ...