LAHORE: The Lahore High Court on Thursday suspended operation of a notification issued by Punjab Food Authority (PFA), which envisaged a ban on production and sale of vegetable ghee (Banaspati) in the province from Aug 1 (tomorrow).

Justice Atir Mehmood passed the stay order on a joint petition filed by 21 ghee mills from across the country.

Representing the petitioners, Barrister Abuzar Salman Khan Niazi argued that the ban was in violation of Article 151, 143, 142 read with entry 27 of federal legislative list of the Constitution. He said the ban also violated the right to lawful trade guaranteed under article 18 of the Constitution.

He contended that only Pakistan Standards and Quality Control Authority (PSQCA) [the federal government] could regulate business of food standards and certifications in the country and not the provincial government.

The counsel pointed out that the petitioners/mills possessed licence granted by the PSQCA to manufacture, market, sell, process and stock banaspati. He said having a licence from the PSQCA meant to use ‘Pakistan Standard and Quality Mark’ in relation to any article, product or process which conforms to the relevant quality standards.

Barrister Niazi further argued that the standards prescribed by the PFA could not regulate food products manufactured in the province for the purposes of export.

He said the PFA had no affiliations with international standardisation bodies, which was imperative for its standards to be recognised at international level, particularly for export purposes.

He stated that the respondent authority was the provincial body, therefore, it could not possibly extend its authority to products that were traded across Pakistan’s provincial and national borders.

The acts of the PFA were contrary to the scheme of the Constitution and prescribing quality standards for goods, which were exported, was the jurisdiction of the parliament, the counsel said adding that the impugned ban was also in violation of Pakistan’s binding international commitments under the World Trade Organization Treaty.

He asked the court to set aside the impugned notification and the regulations of the PFA for being unconstitutional.

After hearing preliminary arguments, Justice Mehmood suspended the impugned notification and also restrained the PFA from taking any coercive action against the petitioners.

The hearing was adjourned for a date to be fixed later.

Published in Dawn, July 31st, 2020

Opinion

Editorial

Hamas’s move
Updated 08 Jul, 2026

Hamas’s move

THE decision taken by Hamas to relinquish governance of Gaza appears to be designed to put the onus on the US and...
Terrorism threat
Updated 08 Jul, 2026

Terrorism threat

THE surge in terrorist violence in Balochistan highlights the renewed threat confronting Pakistan. The martyrdom of...
Football meddling
08 Jul, 2026

Football meddling

AFTER ending co-hosts America’s World Cup run in the last-16 stage, Belgium felt justice had been served. It was...
America at 250
07 Jul, 2026

America at 250

THOUGH America’s 250th independence anniversary observed on Saturday is a significant milestone, the celebrations...
Ravi encroachments
07 Jul, 2026

Ravi encroachments

SUPARCO’S satellite imagery reveals the rapid expansion of Lahore into the floodplains of the Ravi river, with the...
Misdirected justice
07 Jul, 2026

Misdirected justice

ACHILD will be tried in a court of law over January’s deadly Gul Plaza fire that claimed 72 lives, but not, it...