Anti-press tactics

Published June 30, 2019

IN a sign of increasing pressure on the media, the Narendra Modi-led government, apparently retaliating to unfavourable reporting, has stopped giving advertisements to at least three Indian newspapers.

Officials from the Times and ABP groups say their publications have been deliberately starved of government ads worth millions of rupees in a move which began even before Mr Modi was re-elected with a landslide mandate.

Although there has been no official comment on the ban from Delhi, the message is clear.

In the words of one media group’s representative: “Once you don’t toe the government line in your editorial coverage and you write anything against the government, then obviously the only way they can penalise you (is) to choke your advertising supply.”

Even the leader of the opposition in the Lok Sabha has called attention to the government’s tactics to quash criticism, dubbing it “undemocratic”. Ironically, a BJP spokesperson insists that the press in India is free.

The issue of government-sponsored advertisements in the media is a complex one; the ads are usually tenders for government contracts or publicity for government schemes. Their issuance translates to considerable revenue for publications. Much like the situation in Pakistan, in India, too, these advertisements are usually given out on the basis of target audiences and readership.

But in a world where heads of state are increasingly becoming intolerant, authoritarian figures, such as the Indian prime minister, indirect and uncharted means are used to stifle the voices of those whose duty it is to hold leaders accountable.

Instead of respecting press freedom, such personalities undercut the media by halting ads and creating a financial crisis as a way of punishment for critical coverage. And because there are no specific rules that regulate the giving (or holding back) of government ads to media outfits, a legitimised loophole makes room for vindictive behaviour, or blackmail, in the garb of ‘prerogative’.

Such anti-press tactics ought to be condemned. Not only do they exert a financial strain on newspapers and journalists, they also intimidate media personnel and prevent them from holding elected officials accountable — a function which lies at the heart of a healthy democracy.

Mr Modi, whose pre-election advertising blitz showed him plastered on the front pages of scores of newspapers, should tolerate criticism instead of employing crafty ways to suppress journalism.

The world’s largest democracy will present a sorry picture if it curtails press freedom at home.

Published in Dawn, June 30th, 2019

Opinion

Editorial

‘Source of terror’
Updated 29 Mar, 2024

‘Source of terror’

It is clear that going after militant groups inside Afghanistan unilaterally presents its own set of difficulties.
Chipping in
29 Mar, 2024

Chipping in

FEDERAL infrastructure development schemes are located in the provinces. Most such projects — for instance,...
Toxic emitters
29 Mar, 2024

Toxic emitters

IT is concerning to note that dozens of industries have been violating environmental laws in and around Islamabad....
Judiciary’s SOS
Updated 28 Mar, 2024

Judiciary’s SOS

The ball is now in CJP Isa’s court, and he will feel pressure to take action.
Data protection
28 Mar, 2024

Data protection

WHAT do we want? Data protection laws. When do we want them? Immediately. Without delay, if we are to prevent ...
Selling humans
28 Mar, 2024

Selling humans

HUMAN traders feed off economic distress; they peddle promises of a better life to the impoverished who, mired in...