ISLAMABAD: One of the superior court judges facing a reference at the Supreme Judicial Council for alleged misconduct has urged the SJC to hold an open trial instead of conducting the proceedings behind closed doors.

A source privy to the development told Dawn that the senior judge of the Islamabad High Court (IHC) was given a show-cause notice by the SJC on Feb 15 and he is expected to appear before it on March 6.

The reference is based on a complaint made against the judge by some retired employee of the Capital Development Authority (CDA).


Case against IHC judge has been prepared on a complaint of a CDA employee


During the last proceedings, the judge had pleaded before the SJC that guarantees under Article 10A of the Constitution like fair trial and due process would only be ensured if his trial was held in the open court.

According to the source, the judge had argued that the requirement of in-camera proceedings was incorporated in the SJC rules in 2005 but Article 209, under which the SJC had been constituted, was silent about the closed door trial. Moreover, it should be the privilege of the accused whether to face open or in-camera proceedings.

Dawn made attempts to obtain comments from the SJC’s secretary, but in vain.

Against the backdrop of a demand by the legal fraternity, the then chief justice Anwar Zaheer Jamali had on Oct 31, 2015 announced re-activating the SJC for pursuing complaints pending with it for a long time.

Even rights activist Asma Jahangir had stated that the quality of the judges of lower courts was better than the judges posted in high courts.

Article 209 was invoked with the intent to hold accountability to purge the judiciary of members tainted with allegations. As a result, five judges from different high courts were shortlisted and served show-cause notices to respond to allegations of misconduct levelled against them by complainants.

On Feb 28, Justice Mazhar Iqbal Sid­hu of the Lahore High Court resigned two days ahead of appearing before the SJC in a corruption reference. He cited personal reasons for the resignation.

Besides, the Supreme Court is seized with a review petition filed by a member of the Pakistan Bar Council, Barrister Raheel Kamran Sheikh. Barrister Sheikh has asked the court to reconsider and set aside Justice Jamali’s Sept 29 order of dismissing his appeal moved with a request to inform the general public about the number of references pending with the SJC against the superior court judges. Rejecting Barrister Sheikh’s appeal, the former chief justice had held that the prayer made by the petitioner under Article 184(3) of the Constitution was violative of the spirit of Articles 209 and 211 read with the Procedure of Inquiry.

But the petitioner through his review petition has argued that the chief justice or any other judge of the Supreme Court who is also a member of the SJC could not hear and decide the fate of his constitutional petition containing questions about the entertainability, maintainability or merits of the case inasmuch as they form part of the respondent constitutional body.

Published in Dawn, March 5th, 2017

Opinion

Editorial

Judiciary’s SOS
Updated 28 Mar, 2024

Judiciary’s SOS

The ball is now in CJP Isa’s court, and he will feel pressure to take action.
Data protection
28 Mar, 2024

Data protection

WHAT do we want? Data protection laws. When do we want them? Immediately. Without delay, if we are to prevent ...
Selling humans
28 Mar, 2024

Selling humans

HUMAN traders feed off economic distress; they peddle promises of a better life to the impoverished who, mired in...
New terror wave
Updated 27 Mar, 2024

New terror wave

The time has come for decisive government action against militancy.
Development costs
27 Mar, 2024

Development costs

A HEFTY escalation of 30pc in the cost of ongoing federal development schemes is one of the many decisions where the...
Aitchison controversy
Updated 27 Mar, 2024

Aitchison controversy

It is hoped that higher authorities realise that politics and nepotism have no place in schools.