Media perils

Published August 10, 2016

THE death of two cameramen in the Quetta suicide blast on Monday underscores the perils of conflict reporting that Pakistan’s media routinely face.

Mehmood Khan of DawnNews and Aaj TV’s Shahzad Ahmed were among the over 70 people killed in the secondary attack that took place at the Civil Hospital where lawyers and media had gathered following the shooting of senior advocate Bilal Kasi earlier in the morning.

This incident again draws attention to the vulnerability of a media compelled most of the time to tell the story at any cost — 72 media personnel in the country have lost their lives in the line of duty since 2002.

Surely, no story is worth the life of a reporter or cameraman. In fact, covering an attack with the patience and restraint necessary in a risky situation will not detract from the newsworthiness of the story.

Both media houses and their employees ought to realise this and the importance of adhering to safety guidelines in the coverage of terrorism-related incidents.

Coercing reporters to obtain exclusive information and footage in the aftermath of a blast is simply wrong, even for upping the ratings.

Unfortunately, journalism is often driven by commercial interests, and most reporters and cameramen risk their safety to earn a livelihood.

Newsrooms conducting live interviews of injured media workers — some lauded for their intrepidity on air — takes away from the message that safety comes before one’s duty to provide information.

Therefore, news editors must only encourage information and footage obtained safely. On their part, many media workers don’t want to be told how to do their job and indulge in spats with security officials when refused access after an attack — in their quest to shoot footage of victims, some have even hindered medical efforts.

It’s about time editors collectively endorsed and implemented revised and updated SOPs, especially in view of the rising incidence of secondary attacks that have proved more lethal.

Staffers must receive training and security briefings; they must display their press badges and wear flak jackets and helmets, besides familiarising themselves with exit strategies.

Meanwhile, instantly uploaded social media footage also encourages news outlets to push the accepted limits to get the story out quickly. This worsens matters.

The information war reminds one of George Orwell’s words: “In times of universal deceit, telling the truth is a revolutionary act.” Telling the truth is essential but it should be told with sensitivity and without recklessness.

Published in Dawn, August 10th, 2016

Opinion

Editorial

Battling hate
Updated 15 Mar, 2026

Battling hate

In the current scenario, geopolitical conflict, racial prejudice and religious bigotry all contribute to the threats Muslims face.
TB drugs shortage
15 Mar, 2026

TB drugs shortage

‘CRIMINAL negligence’ is the phrase that jumps to mind when one considers the disturbing consequences of the...
Chinese diplomacy
Updated 14 Mar, 2026

Chinese diplomacy

THERE are signs that China is taking a more active role in trying to resolve the issue of cross-border terrorism...
Fragile gains at risk
14 Mar, 2026

Fragile gains at risk

PAKISTAN is confronting an external shock stemming from the US-Israel war on Iran that few of the other affected...
Kidney disease
14 Mar, 2026

Kidney disease

ON World Kidney Day this past Thursday, the Pakistan Medical Association raised the alarm on Pakistan’s...
Delicate balance
Updated 13 Mar, 2026

Delicate balance

PAKISTAN has to maintain a delicate balance where the geopolitics of the US-Israeli aggression against Iran are...