Cabinet committee deliberates filing sedition charges against Imran Khan

Published June 3, 2022
Interior Minister Rana Sana Ullah chairs a meeting of the Cabinet sub committee on Thursday. —APP
Interior Minister Rana Sana Ullah chairs a meeting of the Cabinet sub committee on Thursday. —APP

A special committee of the federal cabinet has deliberated filing a sedition case against former prime minister and Pakistan Tehreek-i-Insaf chairman Imran Khan and the chief ministers of Gilgit-Baltistan and Khyber Pakhtunkhwa for allegedly planning an "attack" on the federation during the party's 'Azadi March'.

According to an Interior Ministry statement reported by state-run APP yesterday, the meeting was chaired by Interior Minister Rana Sanaullah and attended by Minister for Communication Maulana Asad Mahmood, Adviser to the Prime Minister on Kashmir Affairs Qamar Zaman Kaira, Minister for Economic Affairs Sardar Ayaz Sadiq, Minister for Law Justice Azam Nazir Tarar and officials of the Islamabad police.

"The ministry briefed the committee over the PTI’s long march on May 25 and its formal plan to attack the federation," it stated.

The ministers also discussed filing a sedition case against Imran and the provincial chief executives under Section 124A of the Code of Criminal Procedure, which criminalises words/expression which “brings or attempts to bring into hatred or contempt, or excites or attempts to excite disaffection” towards the government.

“However, the committee postponed the meeting to deliberate over the matter further till June 6 to present its final recommendations before the federal cabinet,” the statement added.

Meanwhile, during the meeting, Sanaullah termed PTI’s long march "fitna (sedition)" and said it was a "riot march rather than a 'Haqeeqi Azadi March'".

"It was an armed attack on the federation, besides [being] a mutiny. Formal planning was done to hold the capital hostage on May 25," he alleged, further claiming that the PTI chairman incited his supporters through hate speeches against the state.

With a "plan", he pointed out, about "2,500 miscreants" were brought to Islamabad before May 25. "These miscreants tried to capture D-Chowk before the arrival of Imran Khan."

"The armed group not only attacked the police, Rangers and FC personnel, but set fire to trees and the metro station too. Imran Niazi also violated the May 25 decision of the Supreme Court," the minister added.

The march

Imran Khan's march for 'haqeeqi azadi' — true freedom — on May 25 was preceded by the authorities invoking of Section 144, a measure used to curb gatherings. Shipping containers were put in place on major thoroughfares to block their path.

Read more: How Imran’s march came to an abrupt end

Undeterred by the moves, the marchers, who tried to force through the containers to make their way to Islamabad, were met with tear gas as police tried to disperse them. Police also charged at them with batons.

The march ended on March 26 without a sit-in at D-Chowk, which Imran promised would occur until dates for elections are announced. In a speech to supporters just short of D-Chowk, Imran told the government to announce dates for the elections, failing which he would return in six days.

Opinion

Editorial

Judiciary’s SOS
Updated 28 Mar, 2024

Judiciary’s SOS

The ball is now in CJP Isa’s court, and he will feel pressure to take action.
Data protection
28 Mar, 2024

Data protection

WHAT do we want? Data protection laws. When do we want them? Immediately. Without delay, if we are to prevent ...
Selling humans
28 Mar, 2024

Selling humans

HUMAN traders feed off economic distress; they peddle promises of a better life to the impoverished who, mired in...
New terror wave
Updated 27 Mar, 2024

New terror wave

The time has come for decisive government action against militancy.
Development costs
27 Mar, 2024

Development costs

A HEFTY escalation of 30pc in the cost of ongoing federal development schemes is one of the many decisions where the...
Aitchison controversy
Updated 27 Mar, 2024

Aitchison controversy

It is hoped that higher authorities realise that politics and nepotism have no place in schools.