Fireworks likely during Alvi’s address to joint session

Published September 13, 2021
President Dr Arif Alvi addresses a joint session of parliament in this Aug 20, 2020 file photo. — White Star/File
President Dr Arif Alvi addresses a joint session of parliament in this Aug 20, 2020 file photo. — White Star/File

ISLAMABAD: As Presi­dent Dr Arif Alvi is due to address a joint sitting of parliament on Monday marking the fourth parliamentary year of the National Assembly, opposition parties have threatened to boycott the session and stage protests in and outside the parliament house.

The opposition accuses the Pakistan Tehreek-i-Insaf (PTI) government and the NA Speaker Asad Qaiser of violating the Constitution by not allowing a debate on the presidential address through­out the third parliamentary year that ended on Aug 13.

The protesting parties also lately condemned what they said the ruling party’s threats to the Election Commission of Pakistan (ECP), its attempts to undermine the parliament and to place curbs on media.

As the mandatory presidential address, which has been due since the start of the fourth parliamentary year under Article 56(3) of the Constitution, is scheduled to begin in the evening, pandemonium is expected in the National Assembly. The opposition parties have already finalised their strategy to disrupt the proceedings during President Alvi’s address before staging a walkout and holding a demonstration outside the parliament house.

The third parliamentary year of the PTI government completed on August 13 with the new precedent that the National Assembly gave a ‘vote of thanks’ to the president for his last year’s address to the joint sitting of the parliament without debate.

Strangely enough, the due debate on the address of the president had remained on the agenda of the lower house of the parliament throughout the third parliamentary year, but it was wound up without any debate after only one opposition member belonging to the Pakistan Muslim League-Nawaz Khawaja Asif had spoken on it.

Under a constitutional obligation, the president addresses a joint sitting of the parliament in the beginning of the parliamentary year after which a debate is conducted in the National Assembly to be closed by a minister followed by a vote of thanks to the president.

“It is the unique case in the parliamentary history of Pakistan that the vote of thanks is given on the address of the president without any debate,” said opposition lawmaker belonging to the Pakistan Peoples Party Syed Naveed Qamar.

It was not the way the debate on the presidential address was closed, he complained. “We were expecting that any of the ministers will wind up the debate, but that did not happen,” he regretted.

Besides the boycott of joint session, the opposition has also planned to take part in a demonstration being staged by journalists outside the parliament building against what they said “curbs on media by the government”.

Earlier on Friday, the Pakistan Democratic Movement (PDM) — an alliance of some opposition parties — announced that it would boycott the joint sitting of parliament and join media workers’ protest outside the Parliament House on Sept 13.

The PDM executive committee in a meeting, chaired by Maulana Fazlur Rehman, had decided to boycott the joint sitting of the parliament and that the opposition parties would go to the Parliament on the day and hold a protest before boycotting the session.

Published in Dawn, September 13th, 2021

Opinion

Editorial

Iran’s new leader
Updated 10 Mar, 2026

Iran’s new leader

The position is the most powerful in Iran, bringing together clerical authority and political and ideological leadership.
National priorities
10 Mar, 2026

National priorities

EVEN as the country faces heightened risks of attacks from actual terrorists, an anti-terrorism court in Rawalpindi...
Silenced march
10 Mar, 2026

Silenced march

ON the eve of International Women’s Day, Islamabad Police detained dozens of Aurat March activists who had ...
War & deception
Updated 09 Mar, 2026

War & deception

While there is little doubt that Iran is involved in many of the retaliatory attacks, the facts raise suspicions that another player may be at work.
The witness box
09 Mar, 2026

The witness box

IT is often the fear of the courtroom and what may transpire therein that drives many victims of crime, especially...
Asylum applications
09 Mar, 2026

Asylum applications

BRITAIN’S tough immigration posture has again drawn attention to the sharp rise in asylum claims by Pakistani...