US Ex-Im Bank can’t back new exports as charter lapses

Published July 1, 2015
“It’s hard to believe Ex-Im is going to lapse, but we are,” Fred Hochberg, Ex-Im’s chairman, said. ─ Reuters/File
“It’s hard to believe Ex-Im is going to lapse, but we are,” Fred Hochberg, Ex-Im’s chairman, said. ─ Reuters/File

WASHINGTON: US exporters including Boeing and General Electric won’t be able to obtain new financing for overseas deals from the US Export-Import Bank starting Wednesday.

The situation may be temporary as Congress, which left town last week for a week-long recess without preventing the lapse in the bank’s charter, may consider reauthorising Ex-Im in July. The 81-year-old institution provides financing arrangements that help US companies compete for overseas sales.

Pending applications for Ex-Im financing total more than $9 billion, according to the bank. The House and Senate won’t return until next week, making it inevitable there will be at least a short gap in the bank’s ability to approve applications for financing.

“It’s hard to believe Ex-Im is going to lapse, but we are,” Fred Hochberg, Ex-Im’s chairman, said in a speech last week. “The damage caused by this debate has already cost real Americans their jobs and harmed long-term US global leadership.”

Senate Majority Leader Mitch McConnell of Kentucky, who is opposed to reauthorising the bank, has said he’ll allow its supporters to combine legislation to extend it with a highway funding bill expected to be considered in July. Meanwhile, Ex-Im will continue work on existing agreements, though it can’t approve new loans, guarantees or insurance.

“Our hope and expectation is that this will be one of the first things considered” when Congress returns from its break, Aric Newhouse, senior vice president for policy and government relations at the National Association of Manufacturers, said during a conference call Tuesday.

Congress can reauthorize the bank and promote American businesses or “shut down the bank and put manufacturers on their back heels and put Americans out of work,” Newhouse said.

The fight has pitted two Republican constituencies against each other. The US Chamber of Commerce has pushed hard to reauthorize the bank, contending it supports US jobs. Small- government groups including the Club for Growth argue that Ex-Im should end because it interferes with the free market by choosing which deals receive financial backing.

The lapse is a “small step” toward ending “cronyism” in which some US companies benefit from the federal government’s aid and others don’t, said Rep. Jeb Hensarling, the Texas Republican who is chairman of the House Financial Services Committee.

“Where is the fairness in giving Washington politicians and bureaucrats the power to pick who gets helped and who gets hurt?” Hensarling said in a statement.

Ex-Im proponents are set to meet with President Barack Obama July 8 to plan how to push legislation to revive the institution through Congress. They maintain that the House and Senate would have supported continuing the bank’s charter if given an opportunity to vote on the issue.

Bank backers have struggled to get a floor vote on the issue because top Republicans including McConnell, House Majority Leader Kevin McCarthy of California, and the two committee chairmen with oversight of the bank — Hensarling and Senate Banking Chairman Richard Shelby — oppose extending Ex- Im’s charter.

Don Nelson, president of ProGauge Technologies Inc., an oil industry equipment-maker in Bakersfield, California, said he has met with McCarthy to tell him that the US would lose jobs if Ex-Im disappears.

“He’s just totally ignoring what we’re telling him,” Nelson said during a conference call Tuesday. “I believe he just doesn’t care because it doesn’t fit with his political agenda.”

The Senate strongly backed reauthorising the bank in a June 10 test vote, which McConnell has said demonstrated there is enough support in the chamber to extend Ex-Im’s charter. That 65-31 vote sought to keep alive a proposed amendment to extend the bank’s charter, though the amendment was withdrawn after the roll call.

By arrangement with Washington Post-Bloomberg News Service

Published in Dawn, July 1st, 2015

On a mobile phone? Get the Dawn Mobile App: Apple Store | Google Play

Follow Dawn Business on Twitter, LinkedIn, Instagram and Facebook for insights on business, finance and tech from Pakistan and across the world.

Opinion

Editorial

‘Source of terror’
Updated 29 Mar, 2024

‘Source of terror’

It is clear that going after militant groups inside Afghanistan unilaterally presents its own set of difficulties.
Chipping in
29 Mar, 2024

Chipping in

FEDERAL infrastructure development schemes are located in the provinces. Most such projects — for instance,...
Toxic emitters
29 Mar, 2024

Toxic emitters

IT is concerning to note that dozens of industries have been violating environmental laws in and around Islamabad....
Judiciary’s SOS
Updated 28 Mar, 2024

Judiciary’s SOS

The ball is now in CJP Isa’s court, and he will feel pressure to take action.
Data protection
28 Mar, 2024

Data protection

WHAT do we want? Data protection laws. When do we want them? Immediately. Without delay, if we are to prevent ...
Selling humans
28 Mar, 2024

Selling humans

HUMAN traders feed off economic distress; they peddle promises of a better life to the impoverished who, mired in...