Anthropic AI an ‘unacceptable risk’ to military, US govt says

Published March 18, 2026
US Department of War and Anthropic logos are seen in this illustration taken March 1, 2026. — Reuters/File
US Department of War and Anthropic logos are seen in this illustration taken March 1, 2026. — Reuters/File

Artificial intelligence company Anthropic posed an “unacceptable risk” to military supply chains, the US government insisted on Tuesday, as it defends against the tech firm’s challenge to a designation as dangerous.

Anthropic’s Claude AI model has been in the spotlight in recent weeks both for its alleged use in identifying targets for US bombing in Iran and the company’s refusal that its systems be used to power mass surveillance in the United States or lethal fully autonomous weapons systems.

Justifying its decision to cut ties with Anthropic in response to a legal complaint from the firm, the Pentagon — dubbed the Department of War (DoW) by the Trump administration — said it “became concerned that allowing Anthropic continued access to DoW’s technical and operational warfighting infrastructure would introduce unacceptable risk into DoW supply chains,” in a court document seen by AFP.

“AI systems are acutely vulnerable to manipulation,” the government added in the filing to a California federal court.

“Anthropic could attempt to disable its technology or preemptively alter the behavior of its model either before or during ongoing warfighting operations, if Anthropic — in its discretion — feels that its corporate ‘red lines’ are being crossed,” it said.

Anthropic’s refusal to agree that its AI tech could be deployed by the military for “any lawful use” therefore posed an “unacceptable risk to national security,” the document read.

“Anthropic’s behavior more generally caused the Department to question whether Anthropic represented a trusted partner,” the government said.

Classification as a “supply chain risk,” which Anthropic has challenged in a case against the Pentagon and other arms of the federal government, in theory means that all government suppliers would be barred from doing business with the company.

The designation is typically reserved for organisations from foreign adversary countries, such as Chinese tech giant Huawei.

Other major American tech firms such as Microsoft, which itself both uses Anthropic’s Claude model and supplies the US military, have weighed in on the AI company’s side.

“This is not the time to put at risk the very AI ecosystem that the administration has helped to champion,” Microsoft said in an amicus brief filed with the court last week.

Opinion

Editorial

After the budget
Updated 26 Jun, 2026

After the budget

Though not a bad document per se, the budget for FY27 is a familiar one, and familiarity in our economic history is rarely cause for comfort.
Missing the mark
26 Jun, 2026

Missing the mark

PAKISTAN’S commitment to the SDGs is routinely reaffirmed, but the gap between promises and progress continues to...
Up in smoke
26 Jun, 2026

Up in smoke

PAKISTAN is watching an epidemic unfold as the menace of narcotic abuse hits every fourth household in Karachi ...
Reflection time
Updated 25 Jun, 2026

Reflection time

Israel is the biggest source of instability in the Middle East, and it is high time the US ended its blind support to Tel Aviv, if it genuinely wants peace in the region.
Raised temperatures
25 Jun, 2026

Raised temperatures

THE fraught situation in Azad Jammu and Kashmir requires immense patience and cool heads. Temperatures are raised on...
Debatable remedy
25 Jun, 2026

Debatable remedy

THE Pakistan Psychiatric Society’s challenge to the Federal Shariat Court’s ruling on attempted suicide deserves...