US court takes up mail-in ballot case that could impact Nov polls

Published
0
The US Supreme Court is seen through bicycle fencing in Washington, DC, US, June 23. — AFP/File
The US Supreme Court is seen through bicycle fencing in Washington, DC, US, June 23. — AFP/File

WASHINGTON: The top US court started deliberating on Monday whether mail-in ballots received by authorities after election day can be counted, in a case that could have repercussions for mid-term elections in November.

The case involves a challenge by the Republican National Committee (RNC) to a law in the southern state of Mississippi that allows ballots to be counted if they arrive within five business days after election day.

The ballots must be postmarked by election day.

Fourteen US states allow mail-in ballots to be tallied after the date of the election if they bear a postmark by election day.

Republican President Donald Trump has been a vocal critic of mail-in ballots and has falsely claimed that they contributed to his 2020 election loss to Democrat Joe Biden.

A federal judge ruled in favour of Mississippi, but was overturned by an appeals court panel which said ballots must arrive by election day to be counted.

Mississippi’s solicitor general Scott Stewart, arguing before the Supreme Court, said “states have broad power over elections” and have been allowed to count ballots received after election day for over a century”. “Congress has respected it and no one challenged it until now,” Stewart said.

Democrats tend to use mail-in ballots more than Republicans and the practice became more widespread during the Covid pandemic.

The Trump administration has joined the opponents of the Mississippi law and a ruling by the conservative-dominated Supreme Court could affect the ballot-counting rules in other states.

The mail-in ballot counting case is one of a number of voting rights cases being heard by the Supreme Court this term.

The court, which includes three justices nominated by Trump, heard arguments last year over the use of race to draw congressional electoral districts.

The court is likely to deliver its rulings in the cases by the end of June or early July, which would provide enough time for them to be applied to the November congressional elections.

Published in Dawn, March 24th, 2026

Opinion

Editorial

Muddled hierarchy
Updated 15 Nov, 2026

Muddled hierarchy

The jurisdiction of the two courts and a mechanism for settling disputes between them should be spelt out in law, not left to judges to fight over.
Growing crisis
15 Nov, 2026

Growing crisis

AN emergency can be judged by the speed with which it draws an effective response. The National Population Council’s...
Organised rackets
15 Nov, 2026

Organised rackets

ON the International Day against Transnational Organised Crime, observed today, Pakistan finds itself in a tight...
Referendum talk
Updated 14 Nov, 2026

Referendum talk

Unless the PPP is deliberately using Sindh as a bargaining chip, it should issue a clarification with a clear, consistent position on new administrative units, not one tailored to protect its home turf.
Mineral wealth
Updated 14 Nov, 2026

Mineral wealth

Minerals should not be presented as a solution to Pakistan’s long-term economic difficulties. The aim should be to build an industrial base rather than export raw materials.
Late diagnosis
14 Nov, 2026

Late diagnosis

AS we mark World Diabetes Day today, Pakistan faces a troubling question: how many people are living with diabetes...