Pentagon treads cautiously after official’s missile claims

Published December 21, 2024
Maj-Gen Pat Ryder during his press briefing at the Pentagon. —Screengrab from Pentagon live stream
Maj-Gen Pat Ryder during his press briefing at the Pentagon. —Screengrab from Pentagon live stream

WASHINGTON: The US adopted a cautious tone on Pakistan’s ballistic missile programme on Thursday, a day after a top White House official claimed the country could acquire capabilities to “strike targets in the United States”.

In a press briefing, the Pentagon press secretary, Maj Gen Pat Ryder, refrained from direct criticism when asked about the US sanctions on Pakistan’s state-owned missile development agency and three of its private vendors.

“We value Pakistan as a partner in the region and have worked closely with Pakistan on counterterrorism efforts in the past,” Ryder said, emphasising the Pentagon’s long-standing relationship with Pakistan’s military.

He declined to comment further on Pakistan’s missile development or the sanctions, deflecting such queries to other US agencies.

This tempered response from the Pentagon stands in sharp contrast to the statements made by Deputy National Security Adviser Jon Finer, who on Thursday accused Pakistan of developing long-range ballistic missile capabilities that could pose an “emerging threat” to the US.

Speaking at the Carnegie Endowment for International Peace, Finer expressed “real concerns” about Pakistan’s ballistic missile program, noting that advancements in its technology could enable Islamabad to strike targets far beyond South Asia.

“It’s hard for us to see Pakistan’s actions as anything other than an emerging threat,” Mr Finer said.

The terse tone from US officials came after the State Department sanctioned four Pakistani entities, accusing them of playing a role in the country’s missile development programme.

Military ties

The Pentagon’s careful positioning highlights its intent to preserve ties with the Pakistani military, a key regional partner in past US-led operations.

Analysts believe this stance reflects a deliberate effort to avoid alienating Islamabad, particularly at a time when the US seeks to enhance its influence in the Middle East and South Asia as Pakistan borders both regions.

Diplomatic sources suggest that the Pentagon’s muted response aligns with its history of maintaining military-to-military relations with Pakistan, even during periods of strained political ties between the two nations.

In contrast, the White House’s more confrontational rhetoric appears to reflect growing frustration within the Biden administration over Islamabad’s strategic direction.

Experts warn that the US approach to Pakistan’s missile programme could further strain relations between the two countries.

As Washington grapples with balancing its strategic interests in South Asia, the contrasting tones from different branches of the US government underscore the complexity of its relationship with Pakistan.

Published in Dawn, December 21st, 2024

Opinion

In fight mode

In fight mode

The bouts between political parties and establishment take a toll on country far more than they do on political parties.

Editorial

Meltdown
08 Apr, 2025

Meltdown

A full-blown trade war is upon us as the era of the rules-based, multilateral trading order is nearly over.
Settling differences
Updated 08 Apr, 2025

Settling differences

Unless there is a broad agreement on the path forward, the country will remain trapped in a cycle of recurring instability.
Glacial ingenuity
08 Apr, 2025

Glacial ingenuity

NECESSITY is indeed the mother of invention, as witnessed in Gilgit-Baltistan. In these areas, where climate change...
Going dry
Updated 07 Apr, 2025

Going dry

Authorities should refrain from undertaking any water scheme that infringes on rights of any federating unit to avoid more controversies.
Afghan return
07 Apr, 2025

Afghan return

AS expected, the government of Pakistan is moving ahead with its plan to forcibly repatriate Afghan Citizenship Card...
Hurting women
07 Apr, 2025

Hurting women

MONTH after month, the figures of crimes against women in the country indicate that our society is close to...