WASHINGTON, March 22: Washington’s landmark nuclear agreement with India reflects the flourishing US economic and political relationship with New Delhi, a senior US official said on Wednesday. Undersecretary of State for Political Affairs Nicholas Burns told reporters that India now occupies a “singularly important” place in US foreign policy.

“The relationship between India and the United States is singularly important for our society and for the future of American foreign policy,” he said.

“We think, frankly, that one of the most important strategic initiatives of the United States in the last few years has been the opening to India,” Burns said.

He hailed “the tremendous American private investment in India, particularly in the advanced technology sector (and) the tremendous expansion of trade which has benefited both of our countries,” said Burns, who hailed “a multiplicity of private sector ties.”

“We’ve also seen a real flourishing of ties between American citizens and Indian citizens,” the US diplomat said. “There are 85,000 Indians studying in the United States — that’s the largest group of foreign students.”

“That private sector expansion has been coupled with the emergence of a key — now global — partnership between the Indian and American government, which we think is going to be critical for for stability in Asia ... in South Asia, as well as in the greater Middle East, as we look to the future,” Burns said.

NUCLEAR DEAL: The United States pleaded its case on Wednesday for allowing India to buy sensitive nuclear technology on the world market, at a meeting of an international group reviewing export controls.

“We’re here for the meeting of the Nuclear Suppliers Group (NSG) and we want to take up with them the issue of cooperation with India,” US assistant secretary of state Richard Boucher told reporters in Vienna, where the closed-door session takes place on Thursday.

“The United States and India are engaged in a profound transformation of our relationship,” Boucher said.

“This is a real-world solution. It’s not a perfect solution to all the issues we’ve had with India over the years in the nuclear area.”

Boucher said this was a ‘net plus for non-proliferation’, in a response to criticism that the United States was damaging the non-proliferation regime by opening up nuclear technology transfers to India.—AFP

Opinion

Editorial

War & deception
Updated 09 Mar, 2026

War & deception

While there is little doubt that Iran is involved in many of the retaliatory attacks, the facts raise suspicions that another player may be at work.
The witness box
09 Mar, 2026

The witness box

IT is often the fear of the courtroom and what may transpire therein that drives many victims of crime, especially...
Asylum applications
09 Mar, 2026

Asylum applications

BRITAIN’S tough immigration posture has again drawn attention to the sharp rise in asylum claims by Pakistani...
Petrol shock
Updated 08 Mar, 2026

Petrol shock

With oil markets bracing for more volatility, more price shocks are inevitable in the coming weeks.
Women’s Day
08 Mar, 2026

Women’s Day

IT is a simple truth: societies progress when women are able to shape them. Yet the struggle for equality has never...
Rescuing hockey
08 Mar, 2026

Rescuing hockey

PAKISTAN hockey is back to where it should be. Years of misses came to an end on Friday with a long-awaited...