MIXED messages, retractions and clarifications from the government have become an all-too-common occurrence when it comes to matters of foreign policy. Not only does this undermine the efforts of those in the foreign service, it also doesn’t help the country’s image in the international arena.

Recently, Foreign Minister Shah Mahmood Qureshi himself stirred controversy when he called India’s scrapping of Article 370 of its constitution an “internal matter”. His comment caused an uproar here and abroad for good reason. India has historically rebuffed Pakistan’s position advocating dialogue on India-held Kashmir by insisting that the latter is an ‘internal matter’. For Mr Qureshi to then use the same phrase in a discussion on Article 370 — the revocation of which has been firmly rejected by Pakistan — is truly astonishing. The foreign minister later tweeted that “nothing about Jammu and Kashmir can be India’s internal matter”, but his clarification only makes his initial remarks all the more bewildering.

Unfortunately, this is not the first communication mistake of its kind. Last year, Mr Qureshi was under fire when he publicly criticised Saudi Arabia and the OIC’s silence on occupied Kashmir and demanded that “Riyadh show leadership” on the issue. It took serious backchannel efforts on Islamabad’s part to repair the damage. This week, it was Prime Minister Imran Khan who after scolding Pakistan’s ambassadors on live TV — something that could have been avoided in the first place — flip-flopped and said that his criticism should not have been made public. Prior to this, the cabinet’s reversal of an ECC decision to trade with India, too, showed that there is utter disarray when it comes to communicating our foreign policy.

It is true that Pakistani expats have often complained of the poor quality of service at our missions. However, the foreign service’s contribution to international diplomacy is commendable and something that ought to have the support of the government. Slips of the tongue, U-turns on engagement with other nations and erroneous messaging on a key issue like Kashmir undermine these efforts.

Communication on any issue of foreign policy must be unambiguous and consistent. Given the repercussions such goof-ups have on sensitive relationships, it is the last place where the government should falter or take U-turns. These slips are a case of either poor judgement on the part of advisers or of top officials not listening to good advice. There is simply no room for such blunders in matters as delicate as foreign policy.

Published in Dawn, May 13th, 2021

Opinion

Pariah regimes
21 Sep 2021

Pariah regimes

The world usually struggles to tame even real pariah and rogue regimes.

Editorial

What’s the game?
21 Sep 2021

What’s the game?

Such brinkmanship is being fuelled by incendiary rhetoric as well as inflexible demands of a unilateral nature.
21 Sep 2021

Gas price hike

THE proposed hike of 24pc-37pc in the gas price of the top 23pc residential consumers, who account for 43pc of the...
21 Sep 2021

Green Line buses

AT long last, the first batch of vehicles for Karachi’s Green Line bus project arrived from China on Sunday,...
20 Sep 2021

Banking for women

AS the old adage goes, the proof of the pudding is in the eating. How far the new State Bank initiative —...
Off the red list
Updated 20 Sep 2021

Off the red list

There are aspects of coronavirus management, especially by developed nations towards those less so, that smack of discrimination.
20 Sep 2021

Exciting frontiers

HISTORY was made on Wednesday at the Kennedy Space Centre in Cape Canaveral. It was not the launch of the first, or...