US, South Korea agree on new cost-sharing deal for troops

Published March 9, 2021
This file photo taken on April 26, 2017 shows South Korean and US soldiers watching from an observation post during a joint live firing drill between South Korea and the US at the Seungjin Fire Training Field in Pocheon. - AFP
This file photo taken on April 26, 2017 shows South Korean and US soldiers watching from an observation post during a joint live firing drill between South Korea and the US at the Seungjin Fire Training Field in Pocheon. - AFP

WASHINGTON: The United States and South Korea have reached agreement in principle on a new arrangement for sharing the cost of the American troop presence, which is intended as a bulwark against the threat of North Korean aggression, both countries announced.

The State Department’s Bureau of Political-Military Affairs said the deal includes a negotiated increase in Seoul’s share of the cost, but it provided no details. The Bureau wrote on Twitter that the agreement, if finalised, would reaffirm the US-South Korean treaty alliance as the linchpin of peace, security and prosperity for Northeast Asia.

South Korea’s Foreign Ministry on Monday issued a similar statement, saying the two countries are seeking to tentatively sign the deal. It said the agreement came after three days of face-to-face talks in Washington.

The US keeps about 28,000 troops in South Korea to help deter potential aggression from North Korea, a legacy of the 1950-53 Korean War. But how much South Korea should pay for the American military presence was a thorny issue in bilateral relations under the Trump administration, which often asked its Asian ally to drastically increase its share.

In 2019, the allies struck a deal that required South Korea to pay about $924 million (1.04 trillion won) for the US troops presence, an increase from $830 million in the previous year. But negotiations for a new cost-sharing plan broke down over a US demand that Seoul pay five times what it previously had paid.

The State Department said in a statement that the increase in the South’s share of the cost was meaningful” but was not more specific.

The Wall Street Journal, which was first to report the agreement, said it would last through 2025.

In its statement, the State Department said: Americas alliances are a tremendous source of our strength. This development reflects the Biden-Harris administrations commitment to reinvigorating and modernizing our democratic alliances around the word to advance our shared security and prosperity.

Many conservatives in South Korea worried that then-President Donald Trump might use failed cost-sharing negotiations as an excuse to withdraw some US troops in South Korea as a bargaining chip in now-stalled nuclear talks with North Korean leader Kim Jong Un. The US and South Korea had also halted or cancelled some of their military exercises in recent years to support the nuclear diplomacy, which eventually fell apart due to disputes over US-led sanctions on North Korea.

On Monday, the South Korea and US militaries kicked off annual military drills that would last for nine days. South Korea’s military said the drills are command post exercises and computerised simulation and don’t involve field training. It said the allies reviewed factors like the status of Covid-19 and diplomatic efforts to resume the nuclear talks with North Korea when it decided to hold the drills.

The prospect for a new cost-sharing plan has been heightened as the Biden administration has been seeking to bolster its alliance with South Korean and other countries.

South Korea began paying for the US military deployment in the early 1990s, after rebuilding its economy from the devastation of the Korean War. The big US military presence in South Korea is a symbol of the countries alliance but also a source of long-running anti-American sentiments.

Published in Dawn, March 9th, 2021

Opinion

Missing I.A. Rehman’s wisdom
18 Apr 2021

Missing I.A. Rehman’s wisdom

Does the state of Pakistan, all institutions included, have the political will to address the runaway intolerance in society and
Ostrich approach
18 Apr 2021

Ostrich approach

The logic of blocking social media to contain protests is flawed.
Wings of mediation
18 Apr 2021

Wings of mediation

ADR benefits could ensure the expeditious settlement of tax disputes.
Banning Mr Rizvi
17 Apr 2021

Banning Mr Rizvi

Sooner than later, fanatics start to pull their own strings.

Editorial

18 Apr 2021

More cabinet changes

PRIME MINISTER Imran Khan has reshuffled his cabinet yet again in what is obviously another attempt to shore up his...
Blocking social media
Updated 18 Apr 2021

Blocking social media

FOR four hours this week, all social media platforms in the country were shut down, a measure the government said ...
18 Apr 2021

Peasant rights in Sindh

IN a seminar held in Nawabshah recently, the Sindh Human Rights Commission and Hari Welfare Association reiterated a...
17 Apr 2021

Pak-India mediation

QUESTIONS had been swirling about what and who has prompted the latest detente between Pakistan and India. Now, it...
17 Apr 2021

Energy exploration

SOME exploration and production companies want the government to prioritise offshore exploration — a high-risk...
17 Apr 2021

Professor’s removal

IN a step that will go far in sending a message of reassurance to female students and academic staff in ...