Tribal people’s consent must for KP-Fata merger: Afghan envoy

Published December 21, 2017
Afghan consul general Mohammad Moeen Marastial talks to reporters on Wednesday.—White Star
Afghan consul general Mohammad Moeen Marastial talks to reporters on Wednesday.—White Star

PESHAWAR: A senior Afghan diplomat on Wednesday cautiously responded to a question over the proposed merger of the Federally Administered Tribal Areas with Khyber Pakhtunkhwa and suggested that tribal people’s consent be sought before taking a decision on the matter.

“Our government has no reservations over the merger, but the opinion of the people of the area is paramount before taking such a major decision,” said Peshawar-based Afghan consul general Mohammad Moeen Marastial at a news conference at the press club on Wednesday.

When a reporter sought the Afghan government’s stance on the proposed Fata-KP merger, Mr Marastial said the opinion of the people should be taken into consideration before taking major decisions, though Kabul had no reservations over the merger.

The Afghan diplomat’s statement appears to support the stance of the Jamiat Ulema-i-Islam-Fazl, which also calls for obtaining the consent of the tribal people before the merger. Like the JUI-F, the Pakhtunkhwa Milli Awami Party (PkMAP) also has serious apprehensions over the merger plan.

Marastial says Chabahar port will not affect Afghanistan’s trade with Pakistan

Giving a statement in the National Assembly last Friday, PkMAP chief Mehmood Khan Achakzai had warned that it was a “sensitive issue” and Afghanistan could raise objections to any move to change the status of Fata.

Mr Marastial said that Iran’s Chabahar port would not affect his country’s trade with Pakistan, adding that Chabahar would facilitate trade among Iran, Afghanistan and Central Asian states, while the Karachi port would cater to commercial requirements of Pakistan and Afghanistan.

“Chabahar port will have no effect on bilateral trade between Afghanistan and Pakistan,” he said, adding that cordial relations between Pakistan and Afghanistan could bridge ties among regional countries. The first phase of the Chabahar port was inaugurated early this month and it will serve as an alternative trade route to landlocked Afghanistan.

The educationist-turned-diplomat Moeen Marastial recently took charge in Peshawar. He replaced Abdul Waheed Poyan who has been posed as consul general in Karachi. Before his assignment in Peshawar, he was associate professor in Kabul University.

Mr Marastial was of the view that Kabul and Islamabad should improve relations and cooperation in different fields, including trade, education, culture and transport, instead of dragging their feet on political issues.

“Economic, trade and cultural ties can pave the way for resolving political issues between the two neighbours,” he said, adding that both countries should first improve trade and cultural relations. He said the consulate had very limited objectives and he wanted to strengthen relations with Pakistan in different sectors, including education, transport and culture.

“I will try my best not to involve the Peshawar consulate in political disputes,” he said and added that soon after taking charge he held a meeting with academicians and traders. He said that Islamia College University had increased reserved seats for Afghan students from nine to 15. Similarly, on his request, he said, the KP government had simplified admission process for refugees in schools and colleges. He called for greater cooperation and exchange of delegations between Pakistani and Afghan universities.

In reply to a question, the consul general said that Pakistan and Afghanistan were suffering due to prevailing lawlessness and, therefore, they should make joint efforts to bring about a lasting peace.

He said that other powers, including America, China, Iran and India, were protecting their own interests in the region and Pakistan and Afghanistan should also safeguard their mutual interests.

Mr Marastial categorically stated that Afghanistan would not allow any group or country to use its soil against any country, including Pakistan.

Published in Dawn, December 21st, 2017

Opinion

Editorial

Digital growth
Updated 25 Apr, 2024

Digital growth

Democratising digital development will catalyse a rapid, if not immediate, improvement in human development indicators for the underserved segments of the Pakistani citizenry.
Nikah rights
25 Apr, 2024

Nikah rights

THE Supreme Court recently delivered a judgement championing the rights of women within a marriage. The ruling...
Campus crackdowns
25 Apr, 2024

Campus crackdowns

WHILE most Western governments have either been gladly facilitating Israel’s genocidal war in Gaza, or meekly...
Ties with Tehran
Updated 24 Apr, 2024

Ties with Tehran

Tomorrow, if ties between Washington and Beijing nosedive, and the US asks Pakistan to reconsider CPEC, will we comply?
Working together
24 Apr, 2024

Working together

PAKISTAN’S democracy seems adrift, and no one understands this better than our politicians. The system has gone...
Farmers’ anxiety
24 Apr, 2024

Farmers’ anxiety

WHEAT prices in Punjab have plummeted far below the minimum support price owing to a bumper harvest, reckless...