NEW YORK: A federal judge on Friday approved Bank of America Corp’s $39 million settlement of a gender discrimination lawsuit by female brokers over objections that the accord would enshrine bias on Wall Street.

US District Judge Pamela Chen in Brooklyn, New York called the settlement “in all respects, fair, reasonable, and adequate.” The settlement, announced on Sept 6, resolved claims on behalf of about 4,800 current and former female financial advisers that women were paid less than men, deprived of handling their fair share of lucrative accounts and faced retaliation if they complained.

It is separate from the bank’s $160m settlement with hundreds of black Merrill Lynch & Co brokers who alleged racial bias in pay, promotions and how big accounts were allocated.

Bank of America bought Merrill in January 2009.

Bill Haldin, a spokesman for Bank of America, in an email said the settlement provides for additional steps that “will enrich our existing diversity, inclusion and development programs, providing even more opportunities for women to succeed as financial advisers.” The gender bias accord required Bank of America to hire an independent monitor to oversee improvements and a consultant to study how the bank “teams” brokers. Policy improvements will remain in effect for three years.

Seventy-five female brokers, including named plaintiff Judy Calibuso, had in a Nov. 29 court filing objected to the “meagre” settlement amount and “weak programmatic relief.”

They claimed that approval would represent a “huge step backwards” that would “enshrine” and perpetuate discrimination by Merrill and its Wall Street rivals.Calibuso, a Miami-area broker who had worked since 1995 for Bank of America and a predecessor, had been the only one of the five lead plaintiffs to oppose the settlement, which involved no admission of wrongdoing by the bank, court records show.

She rescinded her decision to opt out of the settlement after a Dec. 20 hearing, the records show.

Rachel Geman, a lawyer for the plaintiffs at Lieff Cabraser Heimann & Bernstein, in an email said she was “pleased we were able to resolve this matter.” Chen awarded Geman’s firm and co-counsel at Outten & Golden Camore than $12.6m to cover fees and costs.

Lawyers for others who objected to the settlement did not respond to requests for comment.—Reuters

Opinion

Editorial

Collective wisdom
05 Mar, 2026

Collective wisdom

IN times like these, when war is raging in the neighbourhood, it is important for the state to bring on board all...
Economic impact
Updated 05 Mar, 2026

Economic impact

The Iran-linked instability highlights the fact that Pakistan’s macroeconomic resilience remains fragile.
Shrouds of innocence
05 Mar, 2026

Shrouds of innocence

TWO-and-a-half years of relentless slaughtering of Palestinian children, with complete impunity and in the most...
Regional climbdown
04 Mar, 2026

Regional climbdown

WITH the region in flames, Pakistan must calibrate its foreign policy accordingly; it has to deal with some ...
Burning questions
Updated 04 Mar, 2026

Burning questions

A credible, independent, and time-bound inquiry is now necessary after the US Consulate protest ended in gruesome bloodshed.
Governance failure
04 Mar, 2026

Governance failure

BENEATH Lahore’s signal-free corridors and road infrastructure lies a darker truth: crumbling sewerage lines,...