Eco-terrorism by a reckless neighbour

Published Updated

THE subcontinent remains trapped in a dangerous, decades-old deadlock. While a recent joint appeal by over a hundred civil society members, former diplomats and academics from both Pakistan and India has urgently called for “meaningful and sustained” peace talks, New Delhi continues its policy of stubborn evasion. This refusal to engage is no longer just a diplomatic stalemate — it is a high-stakes gamble with the security of over a billion people.

Pakistan has repeatedly demonstrated strategic maturity by leaving the doors open for a structured dialogue. In sharp contrast, India’s ruling political setup has consistently weaponised hostility for domestic electoral gains, feeding a jingoistic media narrative to its voter base. However, it is fair to say that this frozen stance completely ignores the shifting ground realities of 2026.

The regional strategic matrix has funda-mentally changed. The subcontinent has entered a highly volatile sub-conventional grey zone where India keeps attempting to normalise “punitive conventional strikes” under the guise of counter-terrorism. To preserve deterrence stability, Pakistan has had to rapidly innovate, investing heavily in precision-guided munitions, drone technology, and intelli-gence, surveillance and reconnaissance (ISR) capabilities that were largely based on artificial intelligence (AI).

However, the most immediate threat to regional survival is ecological. The Indus Waters Treaty (IWT) is facing a severe strain as New Delhi continues to uni-laterally suspend crucial transboundary communications. When senior Indian ministers openly threaten to block downstream water flows amidst severe Himalayan glacial retreat, it ceases to be political rhetoric — it becomes eco-terrorism. Unilateral isolation on shared water resources is a recipe for mutual disaster, risking uncoordinated flash floods and devastating droughts that do not recognise borders.

History proves that even the most bitter of arch-enemies must eventually sit at the negotiating table when existential stakes are high. France and Germany, for instance, transformed centuries of bloody warfare into the bedrock of European cooperation via the 1963 Elysee Treaty. Similarly, the United States and China broke their decades of icy isolation in 1972 because both recognised that complete decoupling was globally catastrophic.

For Pakistan, stabilising an economy and investing in its human capital remains the supreme national priority. True patriotism demands a fierce defence of our territorial sovereignty while actively pushing for a rational regional framework that stops resource weaponisation.

Unilateral isolation is failing. True strategic strength does not lie in running away from the negotiating table; it lies in taking one’s place at the table, restoring full diplomatic connectivity, and securing for South Asia a truly shared future.

Majid Burfat
Karachi

Published in Dawn, July 28th, 2026

Opinion

Editorial

Lull in fighting
Updated 28 Jul, 2026

Lull in fighting

AFTER two weeks of escalating violence, the US has halted its strikes on Iran, with Tehran also silencing it guns....
Water policy
28 Jul, 2026

Water policy

THE country is caught in a crisis where there too much water at the wrong time and too little when it is most ...
Ending hepatitis
28 Jul, 2026

Ending hepatitis

WORLD Hepatitis Day is being observed under the theme ‘Hepatitis: Let’s break it down’, a call to remove the...
Writing on the wall
27 Jul, 2026

Writing on the wall

EVERY few months, another set of figures reminds Pakistan of a painful reality. Sahil’s latest Six Months Cruel...
Still unprepared
27 Jul, 2026

Still unprepared

EVEN as Pakistan counts around 100 deaths since the onset of the monsoon season on June 26, it is bracing for ...
Delayed devolution
27 Jul, 2026

Delayed devolution

THE debate over Islamabad’s reluctance to fully let go of devolved subjects has been running since 2010. But it ...