Quid pro quo

Published
2

MERE hours after the US signed a landmark civil nuclear deal with Saudi Arabia, American President Donald Trump sprang a surprise: the deal would only go through if the Saudis recognised Israel and signed the so-called Abraham Accords. While Riyadh has remained silent over the demand, media reports indicate that recognition of the Zionist state was not part of the negotiations, and is most likely a Trumpian addition to the deal.

Saudi Arabia must join “the very respected and successful Abraham Accords”, Mr Trump said, championing his pet project dating back to his first term, when the UAE, Bahrain and Morocco officially recognised Israel. To ensure there was no ambiguity about Mr Trump’s announcement, the White House press secretary said “the deal is off” if the Saudis refused to join the Accords.

The American leader has been pressing Saudi Arabia and other Muslim states, including Pakistan, for some time to recognise Israel. However, this remains a morally reprehensible proposition considering Tel Aviv’s genocidal violence in Gaza, and its refusal to accept the idea of an independent Palestinian state. Accepting Israel would mean legitimising its violence against the Palestinians, as well as its neighbouring Arab states and Iran.

The official Saudi position remains that recognition cannot come unless there is a ‘pathway’ to a Palestinian state. Pakistan too — which has resisted earlier American calls to embrace Israel — has clearly stated that until there is a Palestinian state with pre-1967 borders and Al Quds as its capital, recognition is not on the agenda.

Moreover, there is widespread support for Palestine amongst the public, and disgust with the atrocious levels of violence unleashed by Israel on the Palestinian people. This makes recognition highly improbable. As for Tel Aviv’s position, the current Israeli prime minister has said that a Palestinian state will not happen. Even more ‘liberal’ Israeli politicians are steadfast in their opposition to a Palestinian state.

Mr Trump’s eagerness to bring the Saudis on board is understandable. While many OIC members have accepted Israel, due to Saudi Arabia’s role as the custodian of Islam’s holiest sites, its recognition would open the floodgates for wider normalisation with Israel in the Muslim world. Pakistan should remain wary. It must not change its principled position on the Palestine question, and resist all America’s attempts at coercing it to embrace the Zionist state.

The Israel ‘brand’ has become toxic the world over, due to Tel Aviv’s extermination campaign in Gaza, and its aggression against Lebanon, Syria, Yemen and Iran. Should such a state be embraced by the Muslim world, when it shows zero remorse for its murderous policies, remains committed to resisting a Palestinian state, and when its leaders openly speak of desecrating Al Aqsa?

Published in Dawn, July 26th, 2026

Opinion

Editorial

Wheat price dilemma
Updated 26 Oct, 2026

Wheat price dilemma

A price no buyer is obliged or financially equipped to pay is only a number. Growers seem to have grasped this before the government did.
Encounter culture
Updated 26 Oct, 2026

Encounter culture

Whether police actions in "encounters" were legitimate or unlawful can only be established through credible investigations.
Recognising distress
26 Oct, 2026

Recognising distress

THE deaths of two families in Karachi, being investigated as suspected murder-suicides, raise disturbing questions...
Prudent warning
Updated 25 Oct, 2026

Prudent warning

Muslim countries have warned against a new conflict. But will the war lobbies in Washington and Tel Aviv listen?
Party of one
25 Oct, 2026

Party of one

IT ill behoves a political party that claims to be the biggest and most popular in the country to be so mired in...
Reckless driving
25 Oct, 2026

Reckless driving

THERE is a lack of official data documenting the crisis, but even by the most conservative estimates, over a dozen...