ISLAMABAD: The Islamabad High Court (IHC) has declared a petition challenging the appointment of Justice Saman Rafat Imtiaz as a judge inadmissible, observing that such litigation reflects a “regrettable tendency” to undermine the independence and dignity of the judiciary.

In a two-page written order, Justice Arbab Muhammad Tahir held that the petition contained “extremely defamatory, baseless and unsubstantiated allegations” against a serving judge, adding that the nature of the claims prima facie fell within the ambit of contempt of court.

The court emphasised that any attempt to scandalise a judge or question judicial conduct through unsubstantiated accusations cannot be entertained, as it directly impacts the institutional integrity of the judiciary. “The tendency to undermine the independence and dignity of the judiciary is very regrettable,” the order stated, while directing the petitioner to exercise caution in future.

The petition had been filed by Advocate Kulsoom Khaliq, challenging the appointment of Justice Saman Rafat Imtiaz. However, the court noted that the allegations raised were linked to judicial proceedings and the conduct of a sitting judge, matters which fall outside the jurisdiction of such petitions.

Justice Tahir underlined that the law provides specific mechanisms for addressing grievances against judicial decisions, including appellate forums. He further clarified that any inquiry into alleged misconduct of a judge lies exclusively within the domain of the Supreme Judicial Council, the constitutional forum empowered to examine complaints against superior court judges.

“The contempt of court petition is not maintainable,” the order concluded.

According to the order, the Registrar Office had initially flagged multiple objections to the petition, questioning its maintainability. Upon judicial scrutiny, the bench endorsed those objections, reinforcing that the petition did not meet the legal requirements for admissibility.

Justice Saman Rafat Imtiaz has recently been transferred from the Islamabad High Court to the Sindh High Court. The transfer, however, was not a subject of adjudication in the present case.

Published in Dawn, May 6th, 2026

Opinion

Editorial

The May war
Updated 06 May, 2026

The May war

Rationality demands that both states come to the table and discuss their grievances, and their solutions in a mature manner.
Looking inwards
06 May, 2026

Looking inwards

REGULAR appraisals by human rights groups and activists should not be treated by the authorities as attempts to ...
Feeling the heat
06 May, 2026

Feeling the heat

ANOTHER heatwave season has begun, and once again, the state is scrambling to respond to conditions it has long been...
Energy shock
Updated 05 May, 2026

Energy shock

The longer the crisis persists, the more profound its consequences will be.
Unchecked HIV
05 May, 2026

Unchecked HIV

PAKISTAN’S HIV surge is no longer a slow-burning public health concern. It is now a system failure unfolding in...
PSL thrills
05 May, 2026

PSL thrills

BY the end of it all, in front of fans who had been absent for almost the entire 11th season of the Pakistan Super...