Petition challenging appointment of Justice Saman Riffat inadmissible: IHC

Published
0
IHC's Justice Saman Rifat Imtiaz. — IHC website
IHC's Justice Saman Rifat Imtiaz. — IHC website

ISLAMABAD: The Islamabad High Court (IHC) has declared a petition challenging the appointment of Justice Saman Rafat Imtiaz as a judge inadmissible, observing that such litigation reflects a “regrettable tendency” to undermine the independence and dignity of the judiciary.

In a two-page written order, Justice Arbab Muhammad Tahir held that the petition contained “extremely defamatory, baseless and unsubstantiated allegations” against a serving judge, adding that the nature of the claims prima facie fell within the ambit of contempt of court.

The court emphasised that any attempt to scandalise a judge or question judicial conduct through unsubstantiated accusations cannot be entertained, as it directly impacts the institutional integrity of the judiciary. “The tendency to undermine the independence and dignity of the judiciary is very regrettable,” the order stated, while directing the petitioner to exercise caution in future.

The petition had been filed by Advocate Kulsoom Khaliq, challenging the appointment of Justice Saman Rafat Imtiaz. However, the court noted that the allegations raised were linked to judicial proceedings and the conduct of a sitting judge, matters which fall outside the jurisdiction of such petitions.

Justice Tahir underlined that the law provides specific mechanisms for addressing grievances against judicial decisions, including appellate forums. He further clarified that any inquiry into alleged misconduct of a judge lies exclusively within the domain of the Supreme Judicial Council, the constitutional forum empowered to examine complaints against superior court judges.

“The contempt of court petition is not maintainable,” the order concluded.

According to the order, the Registrar Office had initially flagged multiple objections to the petition, questioning its maintainability. Upon judicial scrutiny, the bench endorsed those objections, reinforcing that the petition did not meet the legal requirements for admissibility.

Justice Saman Rafat Imtiaz has recently been transferred from the Islamabad High Court to the Sindh High Court. The transfer, however, was not a subject of adjudication in the present case.

Published in Dawn, May 6th, 2026

Opinion

Editorial

State of denial
Updated 18 Oct, 2026

State of denial

If the Taliban regime commits to preventing groups based on its soil from attacking neighbouring states, the process of normalisation and regional integration of Afghanistan can begin.
Suffering in silence
18 Oct, 2026

Suffering in silence

TOO many Pakistani children have nowhere to turn when abused online. An estimated 1.5m internet-using children aged...
Export imperative
18 Oct, 2026

Export imperative

THE government’s efforts to boost Pakistan’s external sector through diversified financing, higher foreign...
No talks
Updated 17 Oct, 2026

No talks

The government should understand that the PTI’s protest march and its reaction to it will look like nothing more than a storm in a teacup.
Strengthening LGs
17 Oct, 2026

Strengthening LGs

THE ECP has done well to refuse to allow the Punjab administration to push the local government elections to April....
Lesser citizens
Updated 17 Oct, 2026

Lesser citizens

Interfaith harmony will prevail when the message to end bias is conveyed from the pulpit, alongside efforts to punish zealotry.