LHC suspends defamation case verdict against Meesha Shafi to the extent of payment of damages

Published May 4, 2026 Updated May 4, 2026 09:48pm
A combination photo shows musicians Meesha Shafi (L) and Ali Zafar (R). — Dawn/File
A combination photo shows musicians Meesha Shafi (L) and Ali Zafar (R). — Dawn/File

LAHORE: The Lahore High Court (LHC) on Monday partially suspended a lower court verdict in a defamation case against singer Meesha Shafi, allowing her to deposit half of the amount of damages with the court and furnish a surety bond for the remaining amount instead of making the payment to singer-cum-actor Ali Zafar.

The court, however, maintained Shafi would remain barred from repeating the allegations of sexual harassment against Zafar. As an interim relief, the bench suspended the trial court’s decision to the extent of the damages only.

The decision came on an appeal filed by Shafi following a sessions court order in March, in which she was directed to pay Zafar Rs5 million in damages for levelling allegations of sexual harassment against him.

The lower court had ruled that the allegations had “not been proved to be true or made for public good, and thus constitute actionable defamation”.

Subsequently, Shafi challenged the civil decree in the LHC.

Her appeal was taken up by a two-member bench, headed by Justice Ahmad Nadeem Arshad and including Justice Malik Waqar Haider Awan.

During the proceedings, her counsel, Saqib Jillani, sought the suspension of the impugned judgment and offered to deposit one-third of the amount she was ordered to pay in cash.

Initially, the bench turned down the request for partial payment, directing that the full amount should be deposited.

However, upon further request, the bench ordered Shafi to deposit Rs2.5m in cash with the court and furnish a surety bond worth the remaining Rs2.5m.

However, the bench observed that the restriction imposed by the trial court barring Shafi from making harassment allegations against Zafar would remain in force.

It also issued a notice to Zafar and adjourned the hearing. Zafar’s counsel, Umar Tariq Gill, present in the court, received the notice.

Shafi, in 2018, had accused Zafar of sexually harassing her on more than one occasion.

Subsequently, Zafar filed a defamation case against her, saying that Shafi’s allegations tarnished his image in public. In the defamation suit, Zafar asked the court to issue a decree against Shafi and direct her to pay Rs1bn as damages to him.

Opinion

A long war?

A long war?

Both sides should have a common interest in averting a protracted conflict but the impasse persists.

Editorial

Interlinked crises
Updated 04 May, 2026

Interlinked crises

The situation vis-à-vis the US-Israeli war on Iran remains tense, with hostilities likely to resume if the diplomatic process fails.
Climate readiness
04 May, 2026

Climate readiness

AS policymakers gather for the Breathe Pakistan conference this week, the urgency is hard to miss. Each year, such...
Kalash preservation
04 May, 2026

Kalash preservation

FOR centuries, the Kalash people have maintained a culture, way of life, language and belief system that is uniquely...
On press freedoms
Updated 03 May, 2026

On press freedoms

THE citizenry forgets, to its own peril, how important a free and independent media is in the preservation of their...
Inflation strain
03 May, 2026

Inflation strain

PAKISTAN’S return to double-digit inflation after 21 months signals renewed economic strain where external shocks...
Troubled waters
03 May, 2026

Troubled waters

PAKISTAN’S water crisis is often framed in terms of scarcity. Increasingly, it is also a crisis of contamination....