Unfairness in cricket

Published
6

INDIA started it; Pakistan have put a stop to it. The government’s decision to allow the Pakistan cricket team to compete at the ICC Twenty20 World Cup, but not to play their match against India comes after months of unpleasant actions and posturing by their rivals. Indian players refused to shake hands with the Pakistanis at last year’s Asia Cup. They then refused to collect the winners’ trophy from Pakistan Cricket Board chairman Mohsin Naqvi, who is also the president of the Asian Cricket Council. India then soured its relations with Bangladesh, resulting in the latter asking for the relocation of their World Cup matches in India. Pakistan stood with Bangladesh, which had expressed security concerns — something India has explicitly done in the past, using it as an excuse to avoid playing matches in Pakistan. The India-led International Cricket Council subsequently replaced Bangladesh with Scotland, with Pakistan calling it hypocrisy. Mr Naqvi referred the matter to the government for a final decision on Pakistan’s participation; the decision came on Sunday following the team’s whitewash of Australia in their three-match T20 series.

It is a bold step, with Pakistan openly expressing its discontent at the manner in which the game is being handled. For all its posturing — and refusing to play bilateral series against Pakistan — India has never declined to play the money-spinning fixture against their arch-rivals at a multilateral tournament. In forfeiting that, Pakistan has clearly indicated that it is pushing for equality in the sport. The ICC reacted immediately, stating that Pakistan should consider the “long-term implications for cricket in its own country”. However, that should not faze the PCB, which unlike the rest of the cricketing world, has survived without having to rely on India for bilateral series. The onus, instead, is on the ICC. For long, it has operated on India’s whims, never calling out the politicisation of cricket. For the sake of the sport, it should work on addressing that.

Published in Dawn, February 3rd, 2026

Opinion

Editorial

Referendum talk
Updated 14 Nov, 2026

Referendum talk

Unless the PPP is deliberately using Sindh as a bargaining chip, it should issue a clarification with a clear, consistent position on new administrative units, not one tailored to protect its home turf.
Mineral wealth
Updated 14 Nov, 2026

Mineral wealth

Minerals should not be presented as a solution to Pakistan’s long-term economic difficulties. The aim should be to build an industrial base rather than export raw materials.
Late diagnosis
14 Nov, 2026

Late diagnosis

AS we mark World Diabetes Day today, Pakistan faces a troubling question: how many people are living with diabetes...
Climate challenges
Updated 13 Nov, 2026

Climate challenges

Pakistan cannot afford to confront its climate crises one disaster, one season and one international summit at a time.
Under fire
Updated 13 Nov, 2026

Under fire

KP police are increasingly vulnerable as they play a frontline role in ongoing operations against terrorists.
Used car imports
13 Nov, 2026

Used car imports

THE government’s effort to restrict used car imports appears to be faltering. So suggest the numbers. Despite...