ISLAMABAD: The trial of former prime minister Imran Khan and his wife Bushra Bibi in £190 million corruption case is likely to complete soon as the Islamabad High Court (IHC) vacated the restraining order against pronouncement of the verdict.

The accountability court a day earlier closed the cross-examination of the prosecution witnesses as the defence counsel examined the last prosecution witness.

The restraining order was issued on petitions of Mr Khan and Bushra Bibi seeking their acquittal in the case.

The IHC, while disposing of the petitions, directed the trial court to decide on their acquittal pleas.

IHC division bench comprising Chief Justice Aamer Farooq and Justice Miangul Hassan Aurangzeb heard the petitions.

Restraining order against pronouncement of verdict vacated

The bench instructed the trial court to thoroughly examine the acquittal petitions and issue a reasoned verdict.

This decision came after lawyers representing Imran Khan and Bushra Bibi, including Chaudhry Zaheer Abbas and Muhammad Usman Riaz Gul, presented their arguments.

The session highlighted key issues surrounding the £190 million case.

Advocate Chaudhry Zaheer Abbas argued that NAB had filed a reference in December 2023 against eight individuals, including Mr Khan.

Only two accused have been charged while six others have been declared absconders.

Mr Abbas said that amendments to NAB laws protect certain cabinet decisions, including the financial transfer in question, and argued that no personal financial interest of the PTI founder was involved.

Justice Aurangzeb inquired about the operational status of the trust associated with the funds, while Chief Justice Aamer Farooq questioned why the acquittal application has been filed at this time, suggesting it may relate to the Supreme Court’s recent decision on NAB amendments.

Special Prosecutor Amjad Pervez pointed out that Bushra Bibi, a private citizen without public office status, should be considered separately, noting that statements of witnesses have not implicated her.

The IHC directed the accountability court to make a determination on the acquittal pleas, noting that a detailed written order will follow.

In its reference against Mr Khan, the NAB alleged that the then cabinet appr­oved a confidential deed in 2019 to give £190m — seized by the UK’s National Crime Agency (NCA) and returned to Pakistan — back to real estate tycoon Malik Riaz.

The case alleged that the former prime minister and his wife, Bushra Bibi, in return got billions of rupees and land worth hundreds of kanals from Bahria Town for “legalising” the money.

The cabinet members of Mr Khan while recording their statements before the judge claimed that they were kept in the dark about the deed related to Malik Riaz.

Published in Dawn, November 8th, 2024

Opinion

From hard to harder

From hard to harder

Instead of ‘hard state’ turning even harder, citizens deserve a state that goes soft on them in delivering democratic and development aspirations.

Editorial

Canal unrest
Updated 03 Apr, 2025

Canal unrest

With rising water scarcity in Indus system, it is crucial to move towards a consensus-driven policymaking process.
Iran-US tension
03 Apr, 2025

Iran-US tension

THE Trump administration’s threats aimed at Iran do not bode well for global peace, and unless Washington changes...
Flights to history
03 Apr, 2025

Flights to history

MOHENJODARO could have been the forgotten gold we desperately need. Instead, this 5,000-year-old well of antiquity ...
Eid amidst crises
Updated 31 Mar, 2025

Eid amidst crises

Until the Muslim world takes practical steps to end these atrocities, these besieged populations will see no joy.
Women’s rights
Updated 01 Apr, 2025

Women’s rights

Such judgements, and others directly impacting women’s rights should be given more airtime in media.
Not helping
Updated 02 Apr, 2025

Not helping

If it's committed to peace in Balochistan, the state must draw a line between militancy and legitimate protest.