Nothing more could have been hoped for from the highest court of the land. With one voice, the Supreme Court has ruled that the government’s ploy to subvert the April 3 vote of no-confidence was ‘unconstitutional’ and all its subsequent decisions, therefore, without legal effect.

In doing so, the apex court has defeated a most egregious assault on the country’s democratic order and reasserted itself as the custodian of the Constitution of Pakistan. It is hoped that the verdict, delivered just as matters seemed to be hurtling towards chaos, will be able to pull the country back from the precipice.

Read: 'The Constitution wins': Legal eagles weigh in on historic SC verdict

It could not have come sooner. Prime Minister Imran Khan’s stubborn insistence on not letting his opponents have the satisfaction of voting him out had rendered Pakistan’s entire democracy a farce. It will be worth remembering that this was a choice, not a compulsion.

Mr Khan had political options: there were many ways he could have gracefully bowed to political realities and thrown his energies into the next elections. Yet, in his obduracy, the prime minister showed the country he would think nothing of pushing it headfirst into a constitutional crisis if it meant getting his way.

The PTI’s reckless decision to have a straightforward parliamentary procedure overruled on the pretext of Article 5 will be a shameful footnote in history. Indeed, after the Supreme Court’s unsympathetic view on the matter, the PTI must introspect and ask whether it itself had been loyal enough to the Constitution when it wilfully ran roughshod over it for a narrow political goal.

The ensuing chaos has wreaked havoc on the economy. The dollar-rupee exchange rate has slipped amidst the uncertainty and there are serious concerns about the adequacy of the country’s current foreign exchange reserves. Our foreign relations, too, have taken a severe beating due to the prime minister’s insistence on creating an international fuss about a ‘foreign conspiracy’ the details of which he has so far been unable to share.

It is commendable that this Supreme Court chose to forge its own path, even though precedent could have afforded it another chance to take cover behind the doctrine of necessity. A dark history of judicial endorsements and quasi-endorsements of unconstitutional and extra-constitutional decisions had greatly dimmed the hopes of an unequivocal ruling on this matter, but this bench, led by the chief justice, has provided new hope for the future.

With the restoration of the National Assembly, the court has returned the power to decide the country’s fate back to the Lower House. After the drubbing it has just received in court, the PTI would be wise to now stick to the rules and play the game to its logical end. If it finds it no longer has a graceful exit left to take, it only has itself to blame.

Opinion

Editorial

On a leash
22 Feb, 2024

On a leash

IT is a done deal. Despite several hiccups and one party’s many ifs and buts, negotiations over the configuration...
Shameful veto
22 Feb, 2024

Shameful veto

THE US has scored a hat-trick by vetoing, for the third time, a resolution in the UN Security Council calling for an...
Truth under threat
22 Feb, 2024

Truth under threat

AS WikiLeaks founder Julian Assange mounts a last-ditch effort against being extradited from the UK to the US, one...
Silencing the public
Updated 21 Feb, 2024

Silencing the public

Acting as if it is unaccountable, it is now curtailing citizens’ digital rights without even bothering to come up with a justification.
Fitch’s concern
Updated 21 Feb, 2024

Fitch’s concern

It warns that “near-term political uncertainty may complicate the country’s efforts to secure a financing agreement with the IMF to succeed the Stand-by Arrangement”.
Zoo zealotry
Updated 21 Feb, 2024

Zoo zealotry

IN a bizarre twist of faith and fur, the Indian right-wing Hindu nationalist group, Vishwa Hindu Parishad, has...