If everyone indulges in political games, then who’s left doing their portion of the work?
Unlike before, the sense of doom and gloom seems to have eclipsed all traditional beacons of hope.
Would controversies have arisen about judges’ appointments if open criteria had been announced?
It is about the perception of whether justice is indeed being delivered.
We should all hope for a better tomorrow when we actually awaken from our slumber...
The line between ‘implementable’ and ‘wishful thinking’ is a fine one indeed.
It is not about disagreeing with the majority or ‘plurality’, but the manner in which such disagreement presents itself.
Thousands of cases are pending in the courts...
What are the baseline benchmarks and standards in the JCP’s overall decision-making methods?
As a society, we tend to establish guilt before innocence and decide before we deliberate.
Open decision-making is symbolic of a judiciary with nothing to hide.
No matter how much lawyers would like to state the obvious, certain considerations come in the way.
Suo motu actions, for all their perceived good, are inherent illustrations of the failure of the judicial system.
The problem lies in the interests and capacities of the various players that drive the judicial set-up.
The lawyers movement failed to bring about change.
What has kept Pakistan from becoming a centre for arbitration?
What determines which approach of a judge?
Did the president act on his own, or on the PM’s advice?
What does the pandemic mean for businesses?
The religious right has been propped up for short-term gains.