A DEADLY attack in Quetta has marred what was otherwise a largely peaceful polling day across the country. It appears that while the unprecedented security net thrown around the polling process was quite effective, the unique and harrowing circumstances of Balochistan rendered the province pervasively vulnerable.

It is too early to reasonably assess if the Election Commission of Pakistan was able to manage the voting process across the country better than in previous elections.

There do appear to be at least some indications that persistent problems — such as access and entry to polling stations, barriers to women voting in some parts of the country, low-level, localised political violence, disruptions etc — were once again in evidence on polling day. That ought to be unacceptable.

Setting aside the political controversies and widespread allegations, the ECP as an institution in its current form has more independence, is better resourced and has more experience in conducting elections than any previous version of the commission. Surely, the ECP can be expected to progressively improve the voting experience for the public.

The real challenge to do so may not be in big cities or parts where there is a media presence, but in less-accessible, far-flung and remote areas. The ECP must do better.

What can be unequivocally applauded is the electorate. In a bitterly divided polity and with the overall results far from certain ahead of polling time, in hot and humid conditions across much of the country, the voter was overwhelmingly disciplined and patient everywhere.

Some skirmishes between political parties and supporters of candidates have been reported, but they do not appear to be widespread.

Provincial and national turnouts will be confirmed by the ECP in due course, but it is already apparent that large parts of the electorate deeply value their right to vote as guaranteed by the Constitution.

The roots of democracy include strengthening democratic institutions, but the commitment of the people to freely choosing their elected representatives is what truly binds the democratic process together.

Too often, democracy in Pakistan is cast as a private struggle among elites and institutions having little bearing on the life of the average citizen.

That suggestion is not just untrue, it is also a dangerous assertion that can only undermine democracy. The Pakistani citizen has consistently and courageously demonstrated a commitment to the electoral process, and democratic continuity permits that widespread sentiment to express itself. The Pakistani voter is deserving of respect and admiration.

Finally, at the time of writing, it is unclear who will lead Pakistan at the federal level and in the provinces. Overnight, the picture may be — hopefully, will be — clear.

Whichever parties or coalitions emerge victorious, they must approach politics with a more democratic and conciliatory spirit. For national stability, politics cannot be allowed to return to an era of open warfare.

Published in Dawn, July 26th, 2018

Opinion

Editorial

The way forward
Updated 12 May, 2025

The way forward

An out-of-the-box solution acceptable to Pakistan, India and the Kashmiris is the only hope for long-term peace in South Asia.
AI opportunity
12 May, 2025

AI opportunity

TIME is running out. According to the latest Human Development Report, published by the UNDP this past Tuesday,...
Ace mountaineer
12 May, 2025

Ace mountaineer

NINE summits, five to go. Sajid Ali Sadpara’s quest to fulfil his late father’s dream and elevate Pakistan’s...
Hostilities cease, at last
Updated 11 May, 2025

Hostilities cease, at last

It is Islamabad and New Delhi that will have to do the heavy lifting thesmselves to secure peace.
Second IMF tranche
11 May, 2025

Second IMF tranche

THE IMF board’s approval of the second tranche of its ongoing $7bn funding arrangement and a new climate ...
War and lies
Updated 10 May, 2025

War and lies

Media on this side of the border is also not above blame.