K-Electric: some questions

Published July 21, 2015
Unfortunately, it is the poorest consumers of Karachi who pay the price for failures of the Ke and the government.—Sumera Adil/File
Unfortunately, it is the poorest consumers of Karachi who pay the price for failures of the Ke and the government.—Sumera Adil/File

The most striking revelation emerging from Nepra’s investigation into the affairs of K-Electric is that the transmission and distribution system of the utility is not capable of handling much more than 2,200MW.

This is striking because the utility’s management repeatedly points out that it has invested in new generation capacity of more than 1,000MW since taking over.

They also point out that the utility’s future potential as an investment opportunity comes from its growing consumer base. But if the transmission and distribution system has not been upgraded to meet this additional demand, or carry the power from the additional generation capacity, then what exactly has the management been doing?

Also read: Federal govt asks K-Electric to address deteriorating performance

It is critical for the management to answer this claim made by Nepra’s fact-finding team.

If the claim is true, and the recent experience during Karachi’s heatwave suggests it is, it then implies the management has been investing more in tangible assets to build the balance sheet of the company and increase its sale price, than in its transmission and distribution capacity whose impact would be less tangible but more beneficial.

The regulator is clearly struggling to find some leverage over the power utility’s private management. Given the difficulties Nepra is having in exercising any sway over K-Electric, perhaps it is worth asking if the regulator is ready for the privatisation of more distribution companies scheduled for later this year.

Moreover, has the water and power ministry used every lever in its control to influence the decisions made by K-Electric’s management?

For instance, of the three places on the board of the company, how many strong and senior people have been placed on these seats?

And what has been their attendance record at board meetings?

If the management has failed to uphold its promises, the government for its part has also not lived up to its obligations. The sad part is that it is the poorest consumers of Karachi who have paid the price for these failures.

Published in Dawn, July 21st, 2015

On a mobile phone? Get the Dawn Mobile App: Apple Store | Google Play

Follow Dawn Business on Twitter, LinkedIn, Instagram and Facebook for insights on business, finance and tech from Pakistan and across the world.

Opinion

Editorial

IMF’s projections
Updated 18 Apr, 2024

IMF’s projections

The problems are well-known and the country is aware of what is needed to stabilise the economy; the challenge is follow-through and implementation.
Hepatitis crisis
18 Apr, 2024

Hepatitis crisis

THE sheer scale of the crisis is staggering. A new WHO report flags Pakistan as the country with the highest number...
Never-ending suffering
18 Apr, 2024

Never-ending suffering

OVER the weekend, the world witnessed an intense spectacle when Iran launched its drone-and-missile barrage against...
Saudi FM’s visit
Updated 17 Apr, 2024

Saudi FM’s visit

The government of Shehbaz Sharif will have to manage a delicate balancing act with Pakistan’s traditional Saudi allies and its Iranian neighbours.
Dharna inquiry
17 Apr, 2024

Dharna inquiry

THE Supreme Court-sanctioned inquiry into the infamous Faizabad dharna of 2017 has turned out to be a damp squib. A...
Future energy
17 Apr, 2024

Future energy

PRIME MINISTER Shehbaz Sharif’s recent directive to the energy sector to curtail Pakistan’s staggering $27bn oil...