K-Electric: some questions

Published July 21, 2015
Unfortunately, it is the poorest consumers of Karachi who pay the price for failures of the Ke and the government.—Sumera Adil/File
Unfortunately, it is the poorest consumers of Karachi who pay the price for failures of the Ke and the government.—Sumera Adil/File

The most striking revelation emerging from Nepra’s investigation into the affairs of K-Electric is that the transmission and distribution system of the utility is not capable of handling much more than 2,200MW.

This is striking because the utility’s management repeatedly points out that it has invested in new generation capacity of more than 1,000MW since taking over.

They also point out that the utility’s future potential as an investment opportunity comes from its growing consumer base. But if the transmission and distribution system has not been upgraded to meet this additional demand, or carry the power from the additional generation capacity, then what exactly has the management been doing?

Also read: Federal govt asks K-Electric to address deteriorating performance

It is critical for the management to answer this claim made by Nepra’s fact-finding team.

If the claim is true, and the recent experience during Karachi’s heatwave suggests it is, it then implies the management has been investing more in tangible assets to build the balance sheet of the company and increase its sale price, than in its transmission and distribution capacity whose impact would be less tangible but more beneficial.

The regulator is clearly struggling to find some leverage over the power utility’s private management. Given the difficulties Nepra is having in exercising any sway over K-Electric, perhaps it is worth asking if the regulator is ready for the privatisation of more distribution companies scheduled for later this year.

Moreover, has the water and power ministry used every lever in its control to influence the decisions made by K-Electric’s management?

For instance, of the three places on the board of the company, how many strong and senior people have been placed on these seats?

And what has been their attendance record at board meetings?

If the management has failed to uphold its promises, the government for its part has also not lived up to its obligations. The sad part is that it is the poorest consumers of Karachi who have paid the price for these failures.

Published in Dawn, July 21st, 2015

On a mobile phone? Get the Dawn Mobile App: Apple Store | Google Play

Follow Dawn Business on Twitter, LinkedIn, Instagram and Facebook for insights on business, finance and tech from Pakistan and across the world.

Opinion

Editorial

Maintaining balance
Updated 16 Feb, 2025

Maintaining balance

It must take a more proactive approach to establishing Pakistan’s bona fides.
Welcome return
16 Feb, 2025

Welcome return

IT is almost here; the moment Pakistan has long been waiting for — the first International Cricket Council...
Childhood trauma
16 Feb, 2025

Childhood trauma

BEING a child in this society should not be so hard. But recurrent reports of child abuse — from burying girl...
The Peca problem
Updated 15 Feb, 2025

The Peca problem

The fight for fundamental freedoms is not the media’s alone, but one that concerns every citizen.
Miners in danger
15 Feb, 2025

Miners in danger

YESTERDAY’S devastating terrorist attack in Harnai, which killed at least 11 coal miners and injured seven others,...
Solar panels scam
15 Feb, 2025

Solar panels scam

THE scam involving over-invoicing to the tune of more than Rs69bn in the import of solar panels raises many ...