KARACHI, June 7: An anti-terrorism court recorded on Saturday the statement of a judicial magistrate in a kidnap for ransom case.

Sajid, Shaukat, Jaffar, Amjad, Riaz and Ramzan are facing trial, being conducted by Judge Ahmed Nawaz Shaikh of the ATC-III, in the case pertaining to the kidnapping of a student of the NED University of Engineering and Technology.

Judicial Magistrate Maqbool Memon testified that police had produced the six accused in his court. He recorded their confessional statements under Section 164 of the Criminal Procedure Code after completing all the legal formalities, said the magistrate.

According to the prosecution, Sajid, Shaukat, Jaffar, Amjad, Riaz and Ramzan had allegedly kidnapped Esha from Gulshan-i-Iqbal on June 24, 2007 and took her to Surjani Town area. They demanded Rs0.5 million as ransom.

The victim’s family informed the police who managed to arrest one of the suspects the very next day.

During interrogations, the suspect told the police that his companions had kept Esha in a house in Surjani Town. Soon after the disclosure, police raided the house, arrested the accused and recovered the kidnapped girl.

A case (FIR No 60/2007) was registered at Mobina Town police station on a complaint of the victim’s family under Section 365-A/34 of the Pakistan Penal Code read with Section 7 of the Anti-terrorism Act.

The accused were indicted on April 5, 2008. However, they pleaded not guilty and opted to contest the case.

After recording the magistrate’s statement on Saturday, Judge Ahmed Nawaz adjourned the case hearing till July 8.

Gang-rape case

The court of additional district and sessions judge-IV, east, deferred indictment of the accused in a case pertaining to the gang-rape of a woman on the premises of Quaid-i-Azam’s mausoleum since the judge was on leave.

According to the prosecution, an 18-year-old woman was subjected to sexual assault after being kidnapped on the premises of the mausoleum by unidentified men on the night of March 15. She was found in an unstable condition outside the mausoleum on March 17.

The case (FIR No 50/2008) was registered at Brigade police station on the complaint of her father under Section 365/B of the Pakistan Penal Code.

The police had arrested an assistant manager security of mausoleum, an accountant and a personal assistant to the resident engineer of the Quaid-i-Azam Mausoleum Management Board for their alleged involvement in the case.

Opinion

Editorial

What now?
20 Sep, 2024

What now?

Govt's actions could turn the reserved seats verdict into a major clash between institutions. It is a risky and unfortunate escalation.
IHK election farce
20 Sep, 2024

IHK election farce

WHILE India will be keen to trumpet the holding of elections in held Kashmir as a return to ‘normalcy’, things...
Donating organs
20 Sep, 2024

Donating organs

CERTAIN philanthropic practices require a more scientific temperament than ours to flourish. Deceased organ donation...
Lingering concerns
19 Sep, 2024

Lingering concerns

Embarrassed after failing to muster numbers during the high-stakes drama that played out all weekend, the govt will need time to regroup.
Pager explosions
Updated 19 Sep, 2024

Pager explosions

This dangerous brinkmanship is likely to drag the region — and the global economy — into a vortex of violence and instability.
Losing to China
19 Sep, 2024

Losing to China

AT a time when they should have stepped up, a sense of complacency seemed to have descended on the Pakistan hockey...