US asylum approval rate falls to lowest in a decade

Published Updated
A demonstrator holds a sign as a small group of clergy gather for a vigil prior to arguments in Noem v Al Otro Lado, a case to determine if noncitizens blocked on the Mexican side of the border by US officials can apply for asylum, at the US Supreme Court building in Washington, DS, the US on March 24, 2026. — Reuters/File
A demonstrator holds a sign as a small group of clergy gather for a vigil prior to arguments in Noem v Al Otro Lado, a case to determine if noncitizens blocked on the Mexican side of the border by US officials can apply for asylum, at the US Supreme Court building in Washington, DS, the US on March 24, 2026. — Reuters/File

WASHINGTON: The rate at which asylum seekers are winning protection in the United States has fallen to its lowest level in at least a decade, according to immigration court data, as the Trump administration’s tougher enforcement policies reshape the country’s asylum system.

Data from the US Depar­tment of Justi­ce’s Executive Office for Immi­gration Review (EOIR) show that immigration ju­­d­­ges decided more than 150,500 asylum cases during the first half of fiscal year 2026 but approved only 5,086 applications.

Asylum grants accou­nted for just 3.4 per cent of all possible case outcomes. When only cases resulting in either approval or den­ial of asylum are counted, the approval rate stood at 8.8pc

The decline represents a sharp reversal from previous years. The asylum approval rate was 24.4pc in fiscal year 2025, 45.7pc in fiscal year 2024 and 48.1pc in fiscal year 2023.

Only 3.4pc of applications approved, compared to 24.4pc in 2025

The figures point to a major shift in how US immigration courts are handling asylum claims.

Immigration advocates and policy analysts attribute the decline to stricter interpretations of asylum law, tig­hter court procedures and bro­ader immigration enfo­rce­ment priorities under President Don­ald Trump’s administration.

Claims based on gang violence or domestic violence have become more difficult to win, while immigration jud­ges have been given greater authority to dismiss incomplete applications more quickly.

Many cases now reaching decisions involve migrants who entered the United States during the administration of former President Joe Biden and have only recently moved through the immigration court backlog.

An analysis of EOIR court records by the Transa­ctional Records Access Cleari­ng­house (TRAC), an independent research organisation at Syracuse University, found that rem­oval orders accounted for roughly four-fifths of completed immigration court cases in fiscal year 2026. TRAC’s analysis also found a significant incre­ase in asylum denials, with more than 59,000 asylum claims denied over a 12-month period, while the number of successful asylum applications fell to a small fraction of previous levels.

The tougher court outcomes have coincided with a broader immigration enfo­rcement campaign.

The Department of Home­land Security (DHS) reports more than 605,000 removals and deportations since January 2025, while immigration monitoring groups and analysts have estimated the total number of migrants deported or returned during this period at between 600,000 and 675,000. According to watchdog organisations and immigration advocacy groups, the administration’s expan­ded enforcement drive has also been accompanied by an estimated 1.9 million additional undocumented immigrants leaving the United States voluntarily.

US officials say about 38pc to 40pc of those removed had criminal records. Immi­gration advocacy groups, however, argue that the broader enforcement campaign has also affected long-term undocumented residents and, in some disputed cases, US citizens.

The American Civil Liberties Union has criticised expanded deportation measures, describing the administration’s fast-track deportation policy as “chaotic, unfair, and inhumane”.

America’s Voice, an immigration advocacy organisation, has warned that “mass deportation is making Ame­rica poorer, weaker, and less safe”.

Published in Dawn, July 13th, 2026

Opinion

Editorial

Banking inertia
Updated 13 Jul, 2026

Banking inertia

PRIME Minister Shehbaz Sharif’s latest call to banks to expand lending to SMEs is nothing new. Every government...
Justice imperilled
13 Jul, 2026

Justice imperilled

THE Human Rights Commission of Pakistan and the International Federation for Human Rights have raised concerns about...
Toxic staple
13 Jul, 2026

Toxic staple

A RECENT article published in Dawn has shed light on the challenges being faced by Sindh’s chilli farmers, whose...
Mixed messaging
Updated 12 Jul, 2026

Mixed messaging

In case the parleys fail, a return to full-scale war would be the likely outcome.
Way forward
12 Jul, 2026

Way forward

A GROUP of estranged PTI leaders, calling themselves the ‘National Dialogue Committee’ and led by figures like...
Recalled orders
12 Jul, 2026

Recalled orders

WHILE justice should be blind, it should not be oblivious to the human suffering some decisions may cause. This is...