Left, right and faithful unite to demand human control over AI

Published
0
A bot using a computer. — CreativeCanvas/ Pixabay
A bot using a computer. — CreativeCanvas/ Pixabay

WASHINGTON: A coalition spanning US conservative figure Steve Bannon, progressives, labour unions and faith groups announced on Wednesday a joint declaration of principles on artificial intelligence, framing the effort as a pushback against what they called Silicon Valley’s reckless deployment of AI.

The declaration lays out 34 principles grouped under five themes: keeping humans in charge, avoiding concentration of power, protecting the human experience, human agency and liberty, and corporate accountability.

“This declaration makes clear AI has incredible opportunities to help humanity flourish like never before,” Future of Life Institute founder and chair Max Tegmark, who helped coordinate the project, said.

“But unfortunately, the path we’re on right now is this race to replace, where you have a small number of incredibly powerful companies very openly saying that they want to build super intelligence, which, by definition, can replace every human job.”

Future of Life made headlines in 2023 when the institute published an open letter calling on all AI laboratories to pause for at least six months the training of state-of-the-art systems given the urgent risks to society.

The letter went viral and drew more than 30,000 signatures, including from Elon Musk, who went on to join the AI race with the creation of his own lab, xAI.

The coalition’s breadth is striking in an era of deep political polarisation, Tegmark said.

Signatories include the American Feder­ation of Teachers and the progressive advocacy group Public Citizen alongside conservative media figures Bannon and Glenn Beck.

Faith organisations including the Congress of Christian Leaders and the G20 Interfaith Forum Association also signed on, as did the actors’ union SAG-AFTRA.

Individual endorsers range from former presidential candidate Ralph Nader and Signal Foundation president Meredith Whittaker to AI researchers Stuart Russell and Yoshua Bengio.

“This is the first time that there is a very clear alternative presented, a better path that is endorsed by such a broad coalition,” Tegmark said. Among the specific measures called for: a ban on legal personhood for AI systems, mandatory labelling identifying AI-generated content, and criminal liability for technology executives whose products cause serious harm.

The announcement coincides with an $8 million advertising campaign launched earlier this month by the institute called “Protect What’s Human,” targeting voters in Iowa, Kentucky, Maine, Michigan and North Carolina — states where AI’s economic impact is already being felt, the institute said.

Founded in 2014, Future of Life Institute is a well funded think tank with staff working across the United States and Europe on risks posed by technology.

It has drawn fierce criticism from major figures in Silicon Valley and the White House, who characterize its efforts as AI doomerism that will slow innovation and cede ground to China in the AI race.

Published in Dawn, March 5th, 2026

Opinion

Editorial

Beneath the surface
09 Oct, 2026

Beneath the surface

THE IMF’s staff-level agreement with Pakistan on the fourth balance-of-payments and the third climate financing...
Moscow disagreement
09 Oct, 2026

Moscow disagreement

THE fact that a consensus on how to deal with terrorism originating in Taliban-ruled Afghanistan eludes regional...
Vanished girls
09 Oct, 2026

Vanished girls

THE scourge of female disappearances in Pakistan should be a matter of shame. Institutional reforms and ...
Conundrum
Updated 08 Oct, 2026

Conundrum

The two sides came close to a breakthrough in the last round. It is hoped that they can cross the finish line on their second attempt.
Gaza’s torment
08 Oct, 2026

Gaza’s torment

THREE years since the Oct 7 Hamas attacks on Israel, the people of Gaza continue to face a nightmarish existence....
The healthy-food gap
08 Oct, 2026

The healthy-food gap

PAKISTAN’S nutrition problem is usually blamed on poverty, poor eating habits or lack of awareness. But according...