Law minister tries to allay concerns over amendment

Published September 17, 2024
Law Minister Azam Nazeer Tarar speaks in the National Assembly on Sept 15, 2024. — X/NAofPakistan
Law Minister Azam Nazeer Tarar speaks in the National Assembly on Sept 15, 2024. — X/NAofPakistan

• Tarar says amendments require cabinet nod before they can be tabled in parliament
• Says it’s not CJP’s job to ‘determine sugar price, dictate party manifestos’
• Qaiser says PTI ready to challenge move in court

KARACHI: After days of hectic political activities and speculations, the law minister on Monday tried to allay the fears of the opposition regarding the ‘Constitutional Package’ and reassured them that any decision on the matter would be taken with a consensus.

Azam Nazeer Tarar, who is usually quite measured in his speeches, appeared vexed over the judiciary’s failure in providing justice, which, according to him, was one of the reasons why a Federal Constitutional Court (FCC) was being proposed.

When former speaker and PTI leader Asad Qaiser criticised the government for trying to pass the bill “in the dark of the night like thieves, on Saturday and Sunday night”, the law minister rose to respond to his criticism.

The minister explained that the proposal was yet to cross the first stage — approval from the cabinet — and could only be presented in parliament afterwards.

Detailing the process to pass a constitutional amendment, Tarar said it is to be first approved by the federal cabinet, after which the CCLC — which he said comprised of all coalition partners — reviewed the legislation thoroughly.

Tarar says amendments require cabinet nod before they can be tabled in parliament

He said consultations on these issues have been ongoing, since before the government’s formation. Naming each party in the ruling coalition, the law minister recounted how the proposed amendment had been discussed with each of them beforehand.

“It was agreed between the PPP and PML-N that the unfinished business of the Charter of Democracy would be addressed,” Mr Tarar said, adding that this included the formation of a FCC.

He claimed a move to set up a similar court was thwarted by “certain powers” in the past.

The lawmakers, back then, were told that the 18th Constitutional Amendment would be “struck down” if any attempts were made to amend the process of the judges’ appointment, he said, without giving more details.

He said the salient features of the Constitutional Package, including the proposal to set up an FCC, were presented in parliament’s special committee, comprising both government and opposition members.

The minister lamented that the issue of a Constitutional Court has been painted as an attempt to favour the incumbent chief justice.

Criticism of judiciary

Mr Tarar also claimed that the judiciary was the only institution functioning without any scrutiny of its performance.

“It is the duty of a judge to provide expeditious justice to poor people,” the minister said, adding that in the existing judicial system, cases linger on for generations.

While stressing the need for a constitutional court, Mr Tarar said a chief justice shouldn’t interfere in political and administrative issues like determining the price of sugar, installing electricity poles and dictating the manifestos of political parties.

The Supreme Court already hears appeals against high court orders, criminal cases, banking disputes and appeals against service tribunals orders.

“We [politicians] also want the court to take political disputes there. We have handed all power to the court,” he lamented.

On the question of the proposed constitutional court’s structure, the minister said it would have a chief justice and seven to eight judges.

He said judges enjoyed official perks and privilege and it was their sole responsibility to dispense timely justices to the masses. Justice delayed was tantamount to justice denied, he added.

Earlier, in his remarks, Mr Qaiser said that his party was ready to challenge the amendments in the courts.

Published in Dawn, September 17th, 2024

Opinion

From hard to harder

From hard to harder

Instead of ‘hard state’ turning even harder, citizens deserve a state that goes soft on them in delivering democratic and development aspirations.

Editorial

Canal unrest
Updated 03 Apr, 2025

Canal unrest

With rising water scarcity in Indus system, it is crucial to move towards a consensus-driven policymaking process.
Iran-US tension
03 Apr, 2025

Iran-US tension

THE Trump administration’s threats aimed at Iran do not bode well for global peace, and unless Washington changes...
Flights to history
03 Apr, 2025

Flights to history

MOHENJODARO could have been the forgotten gold we desperately need. Instead, this 5,000-year-old well of antiquity ...
Eid amidst crises
Updated 31 Mar, 2025

Eid amidst crises

Until the Muslim world takes practical steps to end these atrocities, these besieged populations will see no joy.
Women’s rights
Updated 01 Apr, 2025

Women’s rights

Such judgements, and others directly impacting women’s rights should be given more airtime in media.
Not helping
Updated 02 Apr, 2025

Not helping

If it's committed to peace in Balochistan, the state must draw a line between militancy and legitimate protest.