Council of Islamic Ideology seeks review of SC verdict in Mubarak Sani case

Published August 9, 2024
The Council of Islamic Ideology convenes a meeting of the apex body on August 8. — Council of Islamic Ideology (Facebook)
The Council of Islamic Ideology convenes a meeting of the apex body on August 8. — Council of Islamic Ideology (Facebook)

ISLAMABAD: The Council of Islamic Ideology (CII) has expressed reservations over a number of reasons given by the Supreme Court in its July 24 verdict in the Mubarak Ahmad Sani case and urged the judges to review their ruling.

“The whole nation is perturbed over it [the SC ruling]. This is a matter of faith and love for the Holy Prophet (Peace Be Upon Him) instead of legal technicalities,” said the CII in a statement issued after its meeting on Thursday.

The meeting, held to discuss the SC ruling, was presided over by CII Chairman Dr Muhammad Raghib Hussain Naeemi.

The statement said CII would soon send its detailed report on the matter to the SC, adding that there were many parts of the decision which are considered inappropriate by religious scholars and the CII in light of the Islamic injunctions.

The CII members expressed hope that the SC “will soon review its decision” and urged the government, particularly Prime Minister Shehbaz Sharif, to play an effective role in the matter.

On February 6, an SC bench, led by Chief Justice of Pakistan Qazi Faez Isa, overturned the conviction of Mubarak Sani, who was accused of an offence in 2019 under the Punjab Holy Quran (Printing and Recording) (Amendment) Act.

In its judgement, the court noted that the offence which the defendant has been accused of was not criminalised till 2021. Consequently, the apex court set aside the conviction and ordered the immediate release of the petitioner.

This led to what the government and the legal community termed a “malicious and slanderous campaign” against the chief justice, even prompting the Supreme Court to issue a clarification.

The decision was subsequently challenged by the Punjab government on the grounds that paragraph 9 of the order, regarding Article 20 of the Constitution, needed to be modified as the rights of the citizens as envisaged under the provision were not absolute and instead subject to law, public order and morality.

While accepting the pleas, the Supreme Court on July 24 reportedly declared that the right to profess religion and religious freedom, as ensured by the Constitution, was subject to law, morality and public order.

Published in Dawn, August 9th, 2024

Opinion

From hard to harder

From hard to harder

Instead of ‘hard state’ turning even harder, citizens deserve a state that goes soft on them in delivering democratic and development aspirations.

Editorial

Canal unrest
Updated 03 Apr, 2025

Canal unrest

With rising water scarcity in Indus system, it is crucial to move towards a consensus-driven policymaking process.
Iran-US tension
03 Apr, 2025

Iran-US tension

THE Trump administration’s threats aimed at Iran do not bode well for global peace, and unless Washington changes...
Flights to history
03 Apr, 2025

Flights to history

MOHENJODARO could have been the forgotten gold we desperately need. Instead, this 5,000-year-old well of antiquity ...
Eid amidst crises
Updated 31 Mar, 2025

Eid amidst crises

Until the Muslim world takes practical steps to end these atrocities, these besieged populations will see no joy.
Women’s rights
Updated 01 Apr, 2025

Women’s rights

Such judgements, and others directly impacting women’s rights should be given more airtime in media.
Not helping
Updated 02 Apr, 2025

Not helping

If it's committed to peace in Balochistan, the state must draw a line between militancy and legitimate protest.