The Lahore High Court on Thursday fixed for hearing a petition by pop singer Muhammad Ashraf, also known as Malkoo, challenging his placement on the Provisional National Identification List (PNIL).

The PNIL is a controversial substitute for the Exit Control List, better known as the ECL. It is pertinent to mention that the Federal Investigation Agency (FIA) has been maintaining the PNIL for the last couple of years and in urgent cases, the list is being used as a temporary arrangement to stop people placed therein from going abroad.

LHC Justice Abid Aziz Sheikh will preside over the hearing on Friday.

In the singer’s writ petition filed by Advocate Azhar Siddique, a copy of which is available with Dawn.com, the federal government, interior ministry, Directorate General of Immigration and Passports and the Federal Investigation Agency (FIA) were named as respondents.

It said Malkoo’s name was added to the PNIL in March and has not been removed, with his counsel stating in the petition that his name should not have been on the list for more than one month.

The petition argued that Malkoo was put on the list “in an arbitrary, illegal, without jurisdiction and haphazard manner”.

The petition argued that by putting his name on the PNIL, the respondents had violated Articles 9 (Security of person), 14 (Inviolability of dignity of man), 15 (Freedom of movement), 16 (Freedom of assembly) and 18 (Freedom of trade, business or profession) of the Constitution.

According to the petition, Malkoo released two songs titled Qaeedi 804 and Nak da Koka on his YouTube channel ahead of February’s general elections.

Both songs support PTI founder Imran Khan, who is currently incarcerated in Adiala Jail.

The complaint states that it was because of these songs that his name was put on the PNIL, barring him from travelling to the United Kingdom where he is due to perform live.

“Stopping the petitioner from travelling to UK by placing his name on the PNIL is a clear-cut case of political victimisation,” the petition reads.

The petition requested that Malkoo’s name be taken off the PNIL so he could travel to the UK for his concerts.

It further requested that the court extend any other possible relief to the singer and also order the respondents to allow him to temporarily go abroad for his concerts until the court’s decision on the singer’s petition.

Opinion

From hard to harder

From hard to harder

Instead of ‘hard state’ turning even harder, citizens deserve a state that goes soft on them in delivering democratic and development aspirations.

Editorial

Canal unrest
Updated 03 Apr, 2025

Canal unrest

With rising water scarcity in Indus system, it is crucial to move towards a consensus-driven policymaking process.
Iran-US tension
03 Apr, 2025

Iran-US tension

THE Trump administration’s threats aimed at Iran do not bode well for global peace, and unless Washington changes...
Flights to history
03 Apr, 2025

Flights to history

MOHENJODARO could have been the forgotten gold we desperately need. Instead, this 5,000-year-old well of antiquity ...
Eid amidst crises
Updated 31 Mar, 2025

Eid amidst crises

Until the Muslim world takes practical steps to end these atrocities, these besieged populations will see no joy.
Women’s rights
Updated 01 Apr, 2025

Women’s rights

Such judgements, and others directly impacting women’s rights should be given more airtime in media.
Not helping
Updated 02 Apr, 2025

Not helping

If it's committed to peace in Balochistan, the state must draw a line between militancy and legitimate protest.