Crisis in the making

Published August 12, 2021

THE Supreme Court is the final court of appeal, seen as the ultimate bulwark against injustice in a country that often sees too little justice, where society is riven by ethnic, religious, socioeconomic and gender-based fault lines. When the apex court itself appears in danger of falling victim to divisions within, it creates a sense of deep unease among the people. Such divisions have unfortunately been obvious for some time now, often exacerbated by pressures from without. The furore over the possible appointment of Sindh High Court Chief Justice Ahmed Ali Shaikh as ad hoc judge of the Supreme Court is but the latest episode in an ongoing controversy. It was precipitated by the Judicial Commission of Pakistan’s recommendation last month, by a razor-thin majority, of Justice Mohammed Ali Mazhar’s elevation to the apex court. The problem was that the judge is fifth in terms of seniority on the SHC bench. Lawyers’ bodies across the country vehemently opposed this move and boycotted the courts for a day. They argued that the JCP was violating the criteria of seniority as the guiding principle for elevation to the superior judiciary, according to which Justice Shaikh’s name should have been recommended.

The controversy took a further turn when the JCP decided to consider appointing the SHC chief justice as an ad hoc judge to the Supreme Court, despite Justice Shaikh’s having expressed in a letter to the Commission his disinclination to take up that role. Lawyers’ bodies, already incensed, once again boycotted the courts throughout Sindh. On Tuesday, the JCP voted by a majority of five to four to invite the province’s top judge to accept the appointment for a one-year period, provided he gave his consent. Interestingly, those in favour of extending the invitation were the same JCP members who had voted to elevate a junior judge from the SHC to the apex court, although the attorney general, while supporting the recommendation, said it should be contingent upon Justice Shaikh’s acquiescence. However, given what has transpired of late, one cannot discount the possibility that if Justice Shaikh refuses to reconsider — and who can blame him, for most judges would regard such an appointment as adding insult to injury — the JCP will greenlight his appointment anyway against his will.

The JCP’s refusal to follow precedent, principles and norms is creating an unnecessary constitutional crisis. That this is shaping up on the heels of the damage sustained by the apex court to its prestige in the course of the government’s ill-intentioned reference against Justice Qazi Faez Isa is all the more regrettable. This is the time for the superior judiciary to work towards transparent and objective criteria for elevation to its ranks. It must negate even the slightest impression that anything but integrity underlies its judgements and actions.

Published in Dawn, August 12th, 2021

Opinion

Editorial

Noshki killings
Updated 14 Apr, 2024

Noshki killings

It must be asked why Baloch separatists continue to target civilians as well as security men despite large deployment.
Upholding the law
14 Apr, 2024

Upholding the law

THE recent discord in Bahawalnagar offers a chance to reflect on the sanctity of the law and its enforcement across...
Tragic travels
14 Apr, 2024

Tragic travels

FOR those embarking on road and boat journeys, the probability of fatal accidents has seen a steady rise. The recent...
Security lapses
Updated 13 Apr, 2024

Security lapses

Ensuring the safety of foreign citizens is paramount, not just for diplomatic relations but for our economic future.
An eventful season
13 Apr, 2024

An eventful season

THE Senate chairman and deputy chairman were elected unopposed, and 41 new senators were sworn in on Tuesday,...
Living rough
13 Apr, 2024

Living rough

WE either don’t see them or don’t want to see them — not even when they are actively trying to get our...