ECP panel defers decision in PTI accounts case

Published March 19, 2021
The Election Commission of Pakistan’s (ECP) scrutiny committee has again deferred the decision on summoning account details of four paid employees of the ruling PTI. — INP/File
The Election Commission of Pakistan’s (ECP) scrutiny committee has again deferred the decision on summoning account details of four paid employees of the ruling PTI. — INP/File

ISLAMABAD: The Election Commission of Pakistan’s (ECP) scrutiny committee has again deferred the decision on summoning account details of four paid employees of the ruling Pakistan Tehreek-i-Insaf (PTI) who had been authorised to collect party donations in and outside the country.

The panel met again on Thursday to scrutinise the PTI’s foreign funding. The process has been going on since March 2018 without much headway despite several deadlines to conclude the scrutiny and submit findings to the ECP.

Thursday’s meeting was exclusively focused on Akbar S. Babar’s application seeking State Bank of Pakistan’s (SBP) assistance in requisitioning front accounts of the four PTI employees, including a telephone operator, besides inviting the party’s central finance secretary who had admitted having received funds from the United Arab Emirates through Western Union in front accounts.

The PTI refuses on both counts to cooperate with the ECP committee. On the one hand, the party acknowledges that the front accounts existed and were used for funds collection and, on the other, it refuses to share the details of funds received. Similarly, the party refuses to get recorded the statement of its central finance secretary who had admitted that funds were received from the Middle East in these accounts.

Sources reveal that the petitioner’s lawyer, Syed Ahmad Hassan Shah, assisted by Badar Iqbal Chaudhry, wondered how the scale of illegal funding could be determined without requisitioning the front accounts.

Similarly, he argued, the PTI Special Audit Report was posted on the party’s website and hence it was a public document that must be accepted as primary evidence.

He regretted that even after three years of the scrutiny process there was little tangible progress as the committee refuses to investigate the available evidence.

In a related development, a three-member Supreme Court bench heard a petition filed by Prime Minister Imran Khan challenging the presence of PTI’s founding member Akbar S. Babar in the scrutiny committee as well as the jurisdiction of the ECP to decide his membership issue.

Published in Dawn, March 19th, 2021

Opinion

Editorial

Judiciary’s SOS
Updated 28 Mar, 2024

Judiciary’s SOS

The ball is now in CJP Isa’s court, and he will feel pressure to take action.
Data protection
28 Mar, 2024

Data protection

WHAT do we want? Data protection laws. When do we want them? Immediately. Without delay, if we are to prevent ...
Selling humans
28 Mar, 2024

Selling humans

HUMAN traders feed off economic distress; they peddle promises of a better life to the impoverished who, mired in...
New terror wave
Updated 27 Mar, 2024

New terror wave

The time has come for decisive government action against militancy.
Development costs
27 Mar, 2024

Development costs

A HEFTY escalation of 30pc in the cost of ongoing federal development schemes is one of the many decisions where the...
Aitchison controversy
Updated 27 Mar, 2024

Aitchison controversy

It is hoped that higher authorities realise that politics and nepotism have no place in schools.