LHC fines doctors for 'malafide' petition seeking provision of PPE, financial relief

Published April 25, 2020
Court considers govt reply satisfactory; says legal action can be taken against doctors who filed petition. — Dawn/File
Court considers govt reply satisfactory; says legal action can be taken against doctors who filed petition. — Dawn/File

The Lahore high Court on Saturday threw out a petition by doctors in Punjab seeking personal protective equipment (PPE) and financial relief from the government as "malafide" and ordered the petitioners to also cover the costs of litigation.

In its written order, authored by LHC Chief Justice Mohammad Qasim Khan, the court also allowed the Punjab health department and the provincial government to take action against the petitioning doctors for any laws they may have broken and for "bringing a bad name to the institution".

According to the order, a copy of which is available with Dawn.com, the petitioners pleaded for the provision of protective equipment for all health professionals combating the spread of the novel coronavirus but records shared with the court showed none of the five petitioners had been assigned duties related to coronavirus.

It added that one of the petitioners was posted for a day to screen virus patients, for which he was given complete protective gear.

"For what has been stated above, the instant writ petition on the face of it appears to be a malafide move and an attempt to get easy social media projection for no solid and sound basis thereof," read the order.

Accepting the Punjab government's stance that PPEs are only provided to doctors treating coronavirus patients, the court noted that several developed countries were also facing a shortage of protective gear in the health crisis that has emerged from the pandemic.

The court said it would be unfair to give a verdict against the Punjab government when it had been taking effective measures to ensure the safety of doctors, adding that doctors as public servants also had a responsibility towards the state.

"If for all good reasons, we keep doctors on the highest pedestal, at the same time we cannot allow all and sundry to play havoc in the society by spreading chaos through unauthentic information or levelling allegations against the state or its institutions," the LHC order read.

The court also noted that the pleas by the doctors, including the financial relief package, were directly related to their terms of service, for which they had other means of redressal in the form of hierarchies in the health department.

Without approaching other modes of redressal granted to them, public servants cannot move the high court with a constitutional petition, the chief justice wrote.

Opinion

Editorial

Judiciary’s SOS
Updated 28 Mar, 2024

Judiciary’s SOS

The ball is now in CJP Isa’s court, and he will feel pressure to take action.
Data protection
28 Mar, 2024

Data protection

WHAT do we want? Data protection laws. When do we want them? Immediately. Without delay, if we are to prevent ...
Selling humans
28 Mar, 2024

Selling humans

HUMAN traders feed off economic distress; they peddle promises of a better life to the impoverished who, mired in...
New terror wave
Updated 27 Mar, 2024

New terror wave

The time has come for decisive government action against militancy.
Development costs
27 Mar, 2024

Development costs

A HEFTY escalation of 30pc in the cost of ongoing federal development schemes is one of the many decisions where the...
Aitchison controversy
Updated 27 Mar, 2024

Aitchison controversy

It is hoped that higher authorities realise that politics and nepotism have no place in schools.